PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Optoma HD33

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Optoma HD33 - Optoma HD33
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Optoma HD33 delivers gorgeous 2D and 3D HD images, but shows rainbow artifacts often enough so you should approach it cautiously if you see the rainbow effect easily.

Pros & Cons

    • Breakthrough price for 1080p 3D.
    • No video converter needed for 3D with Blu-ray players, cable TV boxes, and the equivalent.
    • Rainbow effect shows just often enough to keep it from being an extraordinary choice.

Optoma HD33 Specs

Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Built-In Speakers: No
Computer Interfaces: Analog VGA
Computer Interfaces: HDMI
Depth: 12.2 inches
Engine Type: DLP
Height: 4.5 inches
Keystone (Optical or Digital): Digital
Native Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Rated Brightness: 1800 ANSI lumens
Rated Contrast Ratio: 4000:1
Remote Mouse Support: No
RGB Pass-through Connector: No
Supported Video Formats: 1080i
Supported Video Formats: 1080p
Supported Video Formats: 480i
Supported Video Formats: 480p
Supported Video Formats: 576i
Supported Video Formats: 576i/p
Supported Video Formats: 576p
Supported Video Formats: 720i
Supported Video Formats: 720p
Type: Consumer
Video Interfaces: Component
Video Interfaces: Composite
Video Interfaces: HDMI
Warranty Labor: 12 months
Warranty Parts: 12 months
Weight: 10 lb
Width: 14.2 inches
Wireless Connectivity: No
Wireless Remote Control: Yes
Zoom (Optical or Digital): Optical

Few projectors leave me feeling as ambivalent about them as the Optoma HD33 ($1,500 street) does. On the one hand, I love it. It's an impressive projector at a bargain price, with 1080p resolution in 2D and 3D and superb image quality. On the other hand...well, it shows rainbow artifacts, the little red-green-blue flashes that single-chip DLP projectors tend to show when light areas move on screen. If you can ignore the rainbows (and people who aren't sensitive to the effect can), it's a slam dunk winner. If you see them as easily as I do, however, it's an impressive choice, but one that you should approach cautiously.

In some ways, the Optoma HD33 is following in the path of the Optoma HD20 ($1,000 street, 3.5 stars) that I reviewed two years ago. When the HD20 was introduced, it dropped the entry-level price for 1080p significantly, making HD projectors far more affordable. The HD33 does much the same for 3D 1080p projectors, which until now have been in the range of $3,000 and (mostly) up.

Both the HD20 and HD33 fall in the same budget home theater category as the Editors' Choice Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 ($1,299 direct, 4 stars). The key difference is that the HD33 is the only one that offers 3D, much less 3D at 1080p. However, it also lacks some useful conveniences you'll find on the slightly less expensive 8350. In particular, it doesn't offer horizontal and vertical lens shift. The feature gives you much more flexibility for where you can place the projector by letting you move the image with lens shift adjustments rather than moving the projector.

Setup

The HD33 looks a little smaller than its 4.5 by 14.2 by 12.2 inches (HWD), because of a rounded front end on its white case. One unusual touch is the lack of a control panel, so that the only way to change settings is through the remote. Another is a VESA 3D port.

As with the Optoma GT750E ($800 street, 4 stars) that I recently reviewed, the HD33 works with both DLP-link and RF glasses for 3D, and it comes with an external RF emitter that plugs into the VESA 3D port. RF glasses have the advantage of not needing a line of sight to the emitter, so they don't have to resync if you momentarily break the line of sight. Note that Optoma doesn't supply glasses with the HD33, so you might want to buy them at the same time as the projector ($100 each for the rechargeable Optoma models).

Aside from having to plug in the 3D emitter, setup is standard fare, with a 1.2x manual zoom giving you some flexibility in how far you can put the projector from the screen for a given size image. Connectors on the back include two HDMI ports, a VGA port for a computer or component video, three RCA phono plugs for component video, and one RCA plug for composite video. There are no audio ports. As is common with home theater projectors, the HD33 doesn't include an audio system.

Image Brightness and Quality

Optoma rates the HD33 at 1,800 lumens, which could easily be too bright for theater dark lighting and the image size that's typical for a home theater. However, you can drop the brightness to a more appropriate level by switching the lamp from bright to standard mode, and save money on lamps at the same time by increasing the lamp life from a rated 3,000 to 4000 hours. The high brightness also lets the image stand up to some stray light if you want to use it in, say, a family room. I tested primarily with theater dark lighting using a roughly 78-inch wide screen, or 90-inch diagonal at 1080p's 16:9 aspect ratio.

For the 2D tests, I used both DVDs upscaled to 1080p and Blu-ray discs. In both cases, the image was superb in almost every way. The HD33 took our toughest test clips in stride, maintaining shadow detail (detail based on shading in dark areas) and avoiding other issues like posterization (colors changing suddenly where they should change gradually) in clips chosen precisely because they tend to bring out those problems. The only issue I saw was moderate noise showing in large solid areas, like a wall or the sky.

Beyond that, the HD33 delivered fully saturated color with a level of sharpness that made 2D images seem ready to pop off the screen. It also goes a step further, with its PureMotion feature, which adds interpolated frames to reduce judder, the slightly jerky motion caused by the standard 24 frames per second that film uses.

Quite simply, the feature works, with three settings to choose from. The highest level gives the smoothest motion, but adds distracting artifacts. I found the lowest level, which is the default setting, the best compromise, giving noticeably smoother than standard motion without artifacts.

In some ways, the image is almost too good. There's a clear visual difference between film and live video that's hard to pinpoint but easy to see. It's based on some combination of crispness of image, smoothness of motion and perhaps some other issues that aren't obvious. In any case, as I proved to my own satisfaction by playing with the HD33's PureMotion settings, removing judder goes a long way to making filmed scenes look like live video instead.

This is not automatically a good thing. For me at least, watching a movie that looks like live video is a little unnerving, with my subconscious screaming that it just doesn't look right. However, odds are that as movies increasingly go digital, they'll also go to a faster frame rate, and we'll all get used to that live video-like image. In the meantime, if the better image really bothers you, you can always turn PureMotion off.

3D and Rainbows
The 3D image quality deserves just as much praise as the 2D quality, with all the same strong points. Very much worth mention is that, as with the GT750E and few to no other inexpensive projectors, the HD33 offers HDMI 1.4a ports rather than HDMI 1.3, so you don't need a video converter to show 3D from a Blu-ray player, cable, FIOS, or equivalent source.

My one hesitation in recommending the HD33 is that, as with every single-chip DLP projector I've ever tested, it shows rainbow artifacts. The good news is that it doesn't show them all that much. Keep in mind that some people see the rainbows more easily than others, so how much of an issue this will be depends on how sensitive you are to the effect. I see the rainbows easily, and see them often enough with the HD33 so I wouldn't buy it, but not so often that I'd mind watching a full-length movie on it occasionally at a friend's house.

If you're not sure how much this will matter to you and others you watch movies with, try to see the projector in action before making a buying decision. If you have to order one to see it, make sure you can send it back without too high a restocking fee. The projector is impressive enough otherwise to be worth the risk. Even if you can see the rainbows, you may decide they're worth putting up with. And if no one you watch movies with regularly is sensitive to the rainbow effect, the Optoma HD33 is almost impossible to recommend too highly.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

 

Final Thoughts

Optoma HD33 - Optoma HD33

Optoma HD33

4.0 Excellent

The Optoma HD33 delivers gorgeous 2D and 3D HD images, but shows rainbow artifacts often enough so you should approach it cautiously if you see the rainbow effect easily.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio