PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Optoma TW610ST

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Optoma TW610ST - Optoma TW610ST
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Optoma TW610ST data projector offers a bright, high-quality image plus a short-throw lens that lets you throw a big, bright image from a short distance.

Pros & Cons

    • Short-throw lens gives a big image in a tight space.
    • Bright, with a 3,100-lumen rating.
    • HDMI port.
    • 3D-ready.
    • Auto iris-like feature shows an obvious lag before adjusting to brightness changes for different images.

Optoma TW610ST Specs

Aspect Ratio: 16:10
Built-In Speakers: Yes
Computer Interfaces: Analog VGA
Computer Interfaces: HDMI
Depth: 9.6 inches
Engine Type: DLP
Height: 4.5 inches
Keystone (Optical or Digital): Digital
Native Resolution: 1280 x 800
Rated Brightness: 3100 ANSI lumens
Rated Contrast Ratio: 3000:1
Remote Mouse Support: Yes
RGB Pass-through Connector: Yes
Supported Video Formats: 1080i
Supported Video Formats: 1080p
Supported Video Formats: 480p
Supported Video Formats: 576i
Supported Video Formats: 576p
Supported Video Formats: 720p
Type: Business
Video Interfaces: Component
Video Interfaces: Composite
Video Interfaces: HDMI
Video Interfaces: S-Video
Warranty Labor: 36 months
Warranty Parts: 36 months
Weight: 6.9 lb
Wi-Fi connectivity: No
Width: 12 inches
Wireless Connectivity: No
Wireless Remote Control: Yes

In most ways, the Optoma TW610ST ($1,000 street) is a typical DLP-based, WXGA (1280 by 800) projector. But it also offers something a little different to set it apart, namely: a short throw lens that lets it throw a large image from close to the screen. A short throw isn't unique to Optoma, by any means, but it's uncommon enough to earn special attention.

Short throw projectors like the TW610ST or the Editors' Choice Optoma GT720 ($800 street, 4 stars) cost more than equivalent projectors with standard lenses, but if you need one they're well worth the price. They can give you a large image in a small room, and they make it much easier to avoid shadows from people getting between the projector and the screen. Optoma says the TW610ST can throw an 80-inch diagonal (68 inches wide) 16:10 image at less than three feet. I measured it at 68 inches wide from exactly three feet.

The Basics: Connections and Setup
At 6.9 pounds, the TW610ST is light enough to carry with you occasionally, but heavy enough so you probably won't want to make a habit of it. It's more likely to end up permanently in one room, or on a cart going from room to room.

Setup is standard for a short-throw projector with manual focus and no zoom. The back panel offers a full set of connectors, including an HDMI 1.3 port for a computer or video source, two VGA inputs for computers or component video, one pass-through monitor port, and both an S-Video and a composite video port, which are both paired with a single set of phono plugs for stereo audio. Also included are three miniplug connectors for a microphone and for stereo audio input and output.

Brightness and Image Quality
Optoma rates the TW610ST at 3,100 lumens, which is increasingly the norm for this class of projectors. The Casio Green Slim XJ-A250 ($1399.99, 4 stars) that I recently reviewed, for example, is rated at 3,000 lumens. What matters more is that in real world use, the projector can stand up to typical office lighting, with any reasonable size image. In my tests, it was easily bright enough to use at 68 inches wide even with daylight streaming through the windows.

The TW610ST did particularly well for data image quality on our suite of DisplayMate tests. Colors were bright and vibrant, and black on white text was crisp even at the smallest sizes we test with. The few flaws I saw were decidedly minor. White on black text, for example, was unreadable at the smallest sizes, but you're much more likely to be using black on white, and the smallest sizes we test with are smaller than you're likely to use in any case.

As with most data projectors, video images weren't in the same league as data images. The TW610ST handled shadow details in dark scenes better than most data projectors, but I saw some minor posterization (color changing suddenly where it should change gradually) in scenes that tend to bring out the problem.

One issue for both data and video is that the projector includes an electronic equivalent of an auto-iris. The basic idea—for either a real auto iris or the electronic version—is that it lets the projector automatically adjust to make dark images darker and bright images brighter. As is common with auto iris features, however, the TW610ST shows a noticeable lag between the image showing on screen and the feature reacting. The faux auto iris is on by default, but if you find it annoying, it's easy enough to turn off.

A still more important issue was the rainbow effect, with bright areas breaking up into little red-green-blue rainbows. This is always a potential problem for any DLP projector, with some more prone than others to showing it. With data screens, I saw very few rainbows, but they showed up often enough with video so that anyone who's sensitive to the effect will likely find it annoying for extended viewing. This by itself is enough reason to limit the projector to short video clips.

Other Issues
The TW610ST's audio quality is better than average for this class of projector, and the two 5-watt stereo speakers put out enough volume to fill at least a small conference room. One other feature worth mention is 3D support using DLP-Link glasses. As more 3D material becomes available, this could become a highly useful feature, particularly in educational contexts. As with all DLP-link projectors, however, there's some question about how practical it can be for classroom-size audiences, with glasses still selling for $70 or more each.

Ultimately, the TW610ST touches all the right bases. The data image quality is superb, the video quality is good enough for the short video clips you're likely to use a data projector for, and being 3D ready helps guard against obsolescence even if you never wind up using it. If you need a bright, short-throw WXGA data projector for a conference room or classroom, with or without the occasional need to use it as a portable, the TW610ST is a prime candidate. It's also a clear pick for Editors' Choice.

COMPARISON TABLE
Compare the Optoma TW610ST with several other projectors side by side.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

Optoma TW610ST - Optoma TW610ST

Optoma TW610ST

4.0 Excellent

The Optoma TW610ST data projector offers a bright, high-quality image plus a short-throw lens that lets you throw a big, bright image from a short distance.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio