PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Optoma Pico PK101

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Optoma Pico PK101
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

No bigger than a cell phone, the Optoma Pico PK101 projector is small enough to carry anywhere and is a particularly good companion for a video iPod.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Extremely portable, at four ounces.
    • Connects to iPods and standard composite video.
    • Rechargeable batteries.
    • Low brightness limits useful image size.
    • Volume is too low to be useful in most conditions.
    • No audio output connection.

Optoma Pico PK101 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Rated Brightness 11
Warranty 12
Weight 4

Some toys...uh...gizmos...uh...products rate so high on the cool gadget scale that it almost doesn't matter how well they work, and the price is a decidedly secondary consideration. The Optoma Pico PK101 ($399 direct) is a case in point. What's so cool about it? Well, how many projectors have you seen that weigh four ounces and can fit in a shirt pocket? If that doesn't grab your attention, you are not now, and never have been, a gadget geek.

Pico projectors first reared their collective heads in early 2008, with pre-production versions announced at CES. I've been anticipating getting my hands on a production unit ever since, and have been promised early units from three different manufacturers. The PK101 is the first to arrive. (Another, from 3M, is already available as well, and I should have one in hand to review shortly. A third, from Microvision, is promised for the first half of 2009.)

The various pico projectors announced to date have not just been different products, but different types of projectors using an assortment of technologies—DLP, laser, and LCOS (liquid crystal on silicon). The one thing they have in common is size. The engines themselves are small enough to fit inside other devices, like cameras and cell phones. You can be sure they'll be showing up in those devices at some point, so you'll be able to project the photos you've taken on your cell phone, say, directly from your phone.

For the first generation, however, the focus is on standalone projectors like the PK101. In general, these projectors are small enough to carry with you at all times, as accessories for a cell phone or iPod. You can use them for impromptu presentations—potentially connecting them to your cell phone or camera to show pictures, for example (assuming appropriate connectors all around). In the case of the PK101, you can take advantage of the iPod cable it comes with to show movies from your iPod at large size on any handy blank wall.

Optoma's projector is built around a TI engine that marries a 480-by-320 resolution DLP chip to an LED light source that changes sequentially from red to green to blue, the three primary colors that your visual system translates into all the colors you see on screen. The LEDs are rated at 20,000 hours, which means they should last the life of the unit.

The projector is roughly the size and shape of a cell phone, at 0.6 by 2.0 by 4.0 inches (HWD), with the bottom defined by rubber feet to help keep the unit from moving, and the front defined by the lens on one of the 2-inch sides. Some real effort clearly went into making the projector look good, too. The result is an elegant mix of shiny black and silver.

One minor issue is that the black plastic does a great job of taking fingerprints. This may make a good basis for a CSI episode one day, but I found myself repeatedly wiping the case off so it wouldn't look smudged. On the other hand, Optoma supplies a small black protective case, not much larger than the projector itself, so you can carry the PK101 around without handling it or risking a scratch.

Also helping add to the sense of elegant good looks is the visual simplicity of the PK101's controls and connectors. There are only two of each: a focus wheel, a slide switch (power off, low brightness, and high brightness), a mini jack for input, and a USB connector for power.

With so few controls and connections, setup is almost trivial. In addition to the carrying case, the projector comes with two lithium ion batteries, a power block, a USB cable that can connect between the projector and either the power block or a computer's USB port (for power only), and two adaptor cables that can plug into the projector's AV port—one with an iPod connector on the other end, and one with three female RCA phono plug connectors, for composite video and stereo audio.

To set up the projector, you install one of the batteries (they come already charged), plug in the appropriate adaptor cable to connect to an iPod or a standard composite video source, point the projector at any handy open space on a wall, and focus the image. That's it.

According to Optoma, the batteries will last 2 hours on a full charge in low-brightness mode or 1 hour at high brightness. Recharging takes 2 hours if you are only charging, or up to 4 hours if you are using the projector at the same time. Unfortunately, the only way to recharge a battery is by putting it in the projector, which you plug into a power source, so you can't charge one battery while using the other. If you start with both fully charged, however, you can switch batteries when the first runs out, or you can plug into a power source if both batteries are dead. I verified in my tests that the batteries can recharge even while the projector is working.

The ultimate question, of course, is how good the projected image looks. The answer is that it looks good enough to be useful. The PK101's rated brightness is only 11 lumens, which sounds like nothing compared with, say, a home entertainment projector in the 1,000-lumen range, but 11 lumens is a lot brighter than you might expect.

Keep in mind that perception of brightness is roughly logarithmic, so you have to increase brightness by 10 times to perceive an image as being twice as bright, or by 100 times to perceive it as four times as bright. Judged by perception, then, an 11-lumen projector would be about a quarter as bright as an 1,100-lumen projector. Given that 1,100 lumens is a perfectly respectable level for watching movies at reasonably large size in a home theater, 11 lumens should be suitable for a somewhat smaller image.

Unfortunately, I can't report on the PK101's tested brightness, because our tests require connecting the projector to a computer, and the brightness may not be enough to measure reliably in any case. What I can confirm is that I was able to watch a one-hour television show in a darkened room with a 24-inch diagonal image, without eyestrain and without feeling that the image wasn't up to par.

Consider the 24-inch size a conservative minimum. I picked it because larger images seemed a bit dim, although they were still useable. Even at 24 inches, some details got lost in dark areas in scenes that weren't well lit. But the key point is that the image was bright enough to be comfortable to look at for an extended period.

The projector did well on image quality too. Colors were fully saturated, skin tones were realistic, and although I saw the DLP rainbow effect occasionally—with white areas breaking up into red-green-blue rainbows—it didn't show up often enough to be annoying. The volume on the built-in speaker was far too low for my tastes, but it's better than having no sound at all.

Arguably, Optoma's most impressive achievement with the PK101 is that it doesn't have the look and feel of being a first-generation product. There are no obvious oversights, poor design choices, or a general sense that it's not ready for prime time.

To the contrary, the PK101 is well designed from both a technological and an aesthetic perspective. It's easy—make that virtually foolproof—to set up and use; it projects a high quality image; and it delivers new flexibility to projector use that other manufacturers are still only promising. Unfortunately, as much as I like the PK101, it can't earn an Editors' Choice. It represents a brand new category, it's the only projector in that category I've yet had a chance to test, and there's at least the possibility that it will soon be surpassed by competitors. That said, it will take an impressive projector indeed to outdo the PK101. Once I've seen some others to measure it against, it will surely be a strong contender.

For more on this tiny projector, check out our hands-on video with the Optoma Pico PK101 and its main competitor, the 3M Mpro110, on Gearlog.com.

More Projector Reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Optoma Pico PK101

Optoma Pico PK101

4.0 Excellent

No bigger than a cell phone, the Optoma Pico PK101 projector is small enough to carry anywhere and is a particularly good companion for a video iPod.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio