PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

New Research Reveals Google Wallet Unsafe

 & Neil J. Rubenking Principal Writer, Security

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Google Wallet Cracker
It's been a bad week for Google. First, researcher Joshua Rubin from zvelo revealed a quick, simple brute force technique to extract the Google Wallet PIN from a rooted phone. Then a blog called The Smartphone Champ revealed that even if the phone isn't rooted, a thief could gain access to funds in the Google Wallet prepaid card by wiping Google Wallet settings and running setup again. Google responded by suspending new prepaid cards, but pointed out that rooting a phone capable of running Google Wallet will necessarily wipe all its data. Today Rubin demonstrated that it is in fact possible to achieve root privilege on such a phone without wiping the data. Sorry, Google!

I caught a subtle whiff of this possibility in a weekend post on the Google Commerce Blog by Osama Bedier, Vice President, Google Wallet and Payments. This post stated that "in most cases, rooting your phone will cause your Google Wallet data to be automatically wiped from the device." That's a slight step back from Google's earlier contention that there is no way to root a Wallet-compatible phone without wiping the data.

Escalation of Privilege

Rubin's latest post includes full details but remains understandable for any interested user. To start, he points out that there are different ways to attain root privilege on a smartphone. The most common technique involves unlocking the bootloader, but on the Nexus line of phones, unlocking the bootloader automatically wipes all data.

However, Rubin's Google Wallet Cracker doesn't require literally unlocking the bootloader. All it needs to do is break down the sandbox walls that keep one application from accessing another's data by elevating the current user's privilege level.

Rubin's post links to specific vulnerabilities that are present in the current operating system used by Nexus phones, along with a proof-of-concept hack based on one such vulnerability. He tested the exploit code and verified that it gave the current user root privilege without wiping the Google Wallet PIN or any other data. And, as he points out, it's quite likely that even after this vulnerability gets patched, others will surface.

What Does It Mean?

In response to the initial warning, Google (and Rubin) advised users to never, ever run Google Wallet on a rooted phone. This new evidence shows that even if you don't root your phone, a thief could root it ex post facto and steal your funds.

Google and Rubin also both advised users to employ a screen lock of some kind. A simple PIN may not be sufficient. At last summer's Black Hat conference, security expert Dino Dai Zovi offered a list of estimated times to guess different levels of PIN codes. The time to crack a 4-digit numeric pin? Eighteen minutes. Fortunately, as Rubin pointed out, after each handful of bad guesses Android inserts a delay before allowing any more.

There are other ways to gain access to a phone even when a screen lock is active. Rubin explained to me exactly how USB Debugging could be used to get shell access to the device. I'm not going print the details here—no need to make it easy for the bad guys—but trust me; you must turn off USB Debugging.

It's also true that if you inadvertently install a malicious app that includes a privilege escalation exploit, your PIN may have been cracked already. Fortunately that PIN does absolutely no good unless the malware coder somehow connects with the thief who has physical possession of the phone.

Musing on what it would take to gain access through varying levels of security, Rubin concluded that a full password lock and full encryption should be sufficient to keep out the toughest hacker.

Convenience Lost

Google touts Google Wallet as much more convenient than conventional credit cards. Just wave your phone near the PayPass reader and presto! You've paid the bill. Unfortunately, protection powerful enough to block any possibility of PIN cracking cuts down the convenience factor.

Rubin concludes that power users will continue to root their devices and software vulnerabilities aren't going away. Kernel based privilege isolation isn't secure enough to protect "extremely sensitive data like that contained in Google Wallet." Probably Google's best way out of this dilemma will involve navigating some thorny legal issues that currently prevent them from storing the PIN inside the inaccessible Secure Element that holds data like the full credit card number. Let's hope they succeed.

About Our Expert

Neil J. Rubenking

Neil J. Rubenking

Principal Writer, Security

My Experience

When the IBM PC was new, I served as the president of the San Francisco PC User Group for three years. That’s how I met PCMag’s editorial team, who brought me on board in 1986. In the years since that fateful meeting, I’ve become PCMag’s expert on security, privacy, and identity protection, putting antivirus tools, security suites, and all kinds of security software through their paces.

Before my current security gig, I supplied PCMag readers with tips and solutions on using popular applications, operating systems, and programming languages in my "User to User" and "Ask Neil" columns, which began in 1990 and ran for almost 20 years. Along the way, I wrote more than 40 utility articles, as well as Delphi Programming for Dummies and six other books covering DOS, Windows, and programming. I also reviewed thousands of products of all kinds, ranging from early Sierra Online adventure games to AOL’s precursor Q-Link.

In the early 2000s, I turned my focus to security and the growing antivirus industry. After years of working with antivirus, I’m known throughout the security industry as an expert on evaluating antivirus tools. I serve as an advisory board member for the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization (AMTSO), an international nonprofit group dedicated to coordinating and improving testing of anti-malware solutions.

The Technology I Use

Much of the testing I do, particularly testing with real-world ransomware, is just plain dangerous. To perform such tests safely, I sequester them inside virtual machines managed by VMWare Workstation. For cross-platform testing, I use a MacBook Air, a Google Pixel 4, and a 6th-generation iPad.

I rely on my Delphi coding skills to create and maintain small applications. These include programs to check whether an antivirus correctly handled the malware it detected, launch dangerous URLs and record the security program’s reaction, and analyze the malware that I collect for use in testing. I also wrote a tiny browser and text editor for use in testing security apps that have predefined reactions for known products.

I do my writing and research on a Dell OptiPlex desktop, relying on Microsoft Word (my fingers know all the shortcuts). Many of my articles include charts and analysis; Excel is my go-to for those. When work hours end, though, I escape the bounds of Microsoft and Windows. There’s an iPhone in my pocket, I relax with my oversized iPad, and my Kindle Oasis is always loaded with the best science fiction and fantasy.

Read full bio