PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Report: Duqu Worm Used Zero-Day Exploit

 & Neil J. Rubenking Principal Writer, Security

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Duqu Flow Chart
The multi-vector network attack called Duqu made a splash a few weeks ago because of its strong resemblance to Stuxnet. Stuxnet, as you'll remember, was a multi-part targeted attack that's credited with damaging Iran's nuclear capabilities. Duqu's code resembles Stuxnet's closely enough that many security programs initial identified it as Stuxnet. However, the four zero-day exploits that made Stuxnet so powerful are old and harmless now. But wait; it turns out Duqu has a zero-day exploit of its own.

 

CrySyS, the group responsible for the original discovery of Duqu, managed to obtain an installer for the tool. This let them explore exactly how the threat spreads. It turns out that the initial attack comes in the form of a modified Microsoft Word document that exploits a kernel vulnerability hitherto unknown. According to Symantec, Microsoft is "working diligently towards issuing a patch and advisory."

In a post on Symantec's blog researchers detail exactly how the attack takes place. The document in question was designed specifically to target the receiving organization, made to look like something in the ordinary course of business. The report also notes that the shellcode they found ensures the attack will only be installed "during an eight-day window in August."

Once it gets a foothold in the organization, Duqu can spread within the network. Part of the attack is a 'bot-like component that gets instructions from a remote command-and-control (C&C) server. On encountering a computer with access to the network but not to the Internet (typical of computers needing extra security), Duqu creates a bridge that lets the C&C server issue orders despite the lack of a direct Internet connection.

Based on reported instances of Duqu infection researchers have identified six industrial control system manufacturers  (not identified by name in the report) that may have been targets. Two are in Iran and one each in Vietnam, Sudan, and India. The last one has a presence in several European countries. Experts at Symantec, CrySyS, and other organizations continue to work toward a thorough understanding of Duqu and to spot any active attacks against the target companies.

About Our Expert

Neil J. Rubenking

Neil J. Rubenking

Principal Writer, Security

My Experience

When the IBM PC was new, I served as the president of the San Francisco PC User Group for three years. That’s how I met PCMag’s editorial team, who brought me on board in 1986. In the years since that fateful meeting, I’ve become PCMag’s expert on security, privacy, and identity protection, putting antivirus tools, security suites, and all kinds of security software through their paces.

Before my current security gig, I supplied PCMag readers with tips and solutions on using popular applications, operating systems, and programming languages in my "User to User" and "Ask Neil" columns, which began in 1990 and ran for almost 20 years. Along the way, I wrote more than 40 utility articles, as well as Delphi Programming for Dummies and six other books covering DOS, Windows, and programming. I also reviewed thousands of products of all kinds, ranging from early Sierra Online adventure games to AOL’s precursor Q-Link.

In the early 2000s, I turned my focus to security and the growing antivirus industry. After years of working with antivirus, I’m known throughout the security industry as an expert on evaluating antivirus tools. I serve as an advisory board member for the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization (AMTSO), an international nonprofit group dedicated to coordinating and improving testing of anti-malware solutions.

The Technology I Use

Much of the testing I do, particularly testing with real-world ransomware, is just plain dangerous. To perform such tests safely, I sequester them inside virtual machines managed by VMWare Workstation. For cross-platform testing, I use a MacBook Air, a Google Pixel 4, and a 6th-generation iPad.

I rely on my Delphi coding skills to create and maintain small applications. These include programs to check whether an antivirus correctly handled the malware it detected, launch dangerous URLs and record the security program’s reaction, and analyze the malware that I collect for use in testing. I also wrote a tiny browser and text editor for use in testing security apps that have predefined reactions for known products.

I do my writing and research on a Dell OptiPlex desktop, relying on Microsoft Word (my fingers know all the shortcuts). Many of my articles include charts and analysis; Excel is my go-to for those. When work hours end, though, I escape the bounds of Microsoft and Windows. There’s an iPhone in my pocket, I relax with my oversized iPad, and my Kindle Oasis is always loaded with the best science fiction and fantasy.

Read full bio