PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Olympus XZ-2

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Olympus XZ-2 has a bright lens and captures sharp photos, but it's too expensive and photos start to show some noise as you notch up the ISO. - Digital Cameras
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Olympus XZ-2 has a bright lens and captures sharp photos, but it's too expensive and photos start to show some noise as you notch up the ISO.
Best Deal£740.97

Buy It Now

£740.97

Pros & Cons

    • Fast lens.
    • Excellent control layout.
    • Tilting touch-screen LCD.
    • EVF option.
    • Hot shoe.
    • Raw shooting support.
    • Expensive.
    • No Wi-Fi or GPS.
    • Noisy images at high ISOs.

Olympus XZ-2 Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 96 mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 24
Battery Type Lithium Ion
Dimensions 2.6 by 4.4 by 1.9 inches
Display Resolution 920000
Maximum ISO 12800
Maximum Waterproof Depth 0
Memory Card Format Secure Digital
Memory Card Format Secure Digital Extended Capacity
Memory Card Format Secure Digital High Capacity
Optical Zoom 4 x
Sensor Resolution 12
Sensor Size 7.6 x 5.7 (1/1.7")
Sensor Type CMOS
Stabilization Optical
Touch Screen
Type Compact
Video Resolution 1080p
Video Resolution 720p
Weight 12.2

The Olympus XZ-2 ($599.99 direct) is one of the more expensive point-and-shoot cameras you'll find. Its image quality, fast lens, and excellent control layout go a long way toward justifying the high price. But the heart of the camera—a 1/1.7-inch 12-megapixel image sensor—just can't keep up with the 1-inch 20-megapixel sensor found on our Editors' Choice Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 SEE IT, which is just a little more expensive than the XZ-2 at $650, but is capable of much more impressive images.

Design and Features
The XZ-2's design is pretty standard for a large-sensor point-and-shoot with a hot shoe. It's a bit bigger on all sides than standard compacts and superzooms. The lens housing juts out from the body, and an old-fashioned lens cap is included to protect it when it's not in use. The camera measures 2.6 by 4.4 by 1.9 inches and weighs 12.2 ounces—not too far off from the similar Samsung EX2F, which is 2.4 by 4.4 by 1.1 inches and 10.4 ounces. The EX2F features Wi-Fi, which is absent in the XZ-2, but doesn't support an add-on EVF like the Olympus does.

Most point-and-shoots pack a 1/2.3-inch sensor, which covers roughly 65 percent of the surface area of the 1/1.7-inch sensor found in the XZ-2. Along with a larger sensor, the camera has a big lens that takes in a lot of light. The 28-112mm (35mm equivalent) zoom has an f/1.8-2.5 aperture range. This makes it possible to shoot without a flash in darker environments. It's not the absolute fastest lens you'll find in a compact camera—that honor currently goes to the 24-90mm f/1.4-2.3 zoom in the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7—but it's not far off.

The 3-inch, 920k-dot rear LCD tilts so you can shoot with the camera above your head or at your waist. The display is very sharp so you can confirm focus, and bright enough to use on sunny days. It's touch-enabled, so you can use it to set a focus point or to fire the shutter. Menu navigation via touch is not supported, but you can swipe through photos in playback mode.

The control layout is designed to meet the needs of demanding photographers. There's a mode dial on the top of the camera, as well as a Record button for movies. The ring surrounding the lens acts as a control device—in Standard mode it controls aperture or shutter speed with detent stops. There's a toggle switch that changes its function—the detents are removed and the ring acts as a smooth control for manual focus. Manual focus comes in especially handy with macro shooting—the XZ-2 can focus down to 1 centimeter, and getting the exact focus point you want is easy using the control ring. 

Rear controls include buttons for EV Compensation, flash settings, and Drive Mode. There's an OK button in the center of the rear control wheel that brings up a software overlay menu from which other settings, including Focus Mode, ISO, and Flash Compensation, can be adjusted. 

Performance and ConclusionsOlympux XZ-2 : Benchmark Tests
The XZ-2 can start and grab a shot in an impressive 1.6 seconds. It records a 0.2-second shutter lag, a respectable figure for a point-and-shoot, and can fire off shots continuously at about 3 frames per second. It does a bit better than the similar Canon PowerShot S110, which requires 2.2 seconds to start and shoot, and is limited to 2 frames per second, but matches the XZ-2's shutter lag.

I used Imatest to check the camera's sharpness and noise performance. The lens is quite sharp; it records 2,003 lines per picture height—better than the 1,800-line center-weighted score that we use as the cutoff for acceptable sharpness. It doesn't score nearly as well on the noise test. Out-of-camera JPGs—the camera also shoots Raw, but is not yet supported by Lightroom or Aperture—contain more than 1.5 percent noise starting at ISO 400. Noise hovers around 2 percent through ISO 1600, and in the XZ-2's defense, detail is excellent all the way through that setting, and good at ISO 3200.

The noise doesn't effect color fidelity, but rather just gives high ISO shots a grainy texture, which is much less distracting than the chroma noise that often plagues digital images at very high ISO settings. I wouldn't set the camera any higher than ISO 3200, as detail starts to break down quickly past that setting—which is a shame, as the XZ-2 can be cranked all the way up to ISO 12800. The Sony RX100, which has a bigger image sensor, does a better job balancing noise and detail—it keeps noise below 1.5 percent through ISO 6400, and captures excellent image detail in low-noise images through ISO 3200.

Video is recorded in QuickTime format at 1080p30 resolution. It's very sharp, and colors are accurate, but the camera is a little slow to refocus when recording and the noise of the lens zooming is audible on the soundtrack. There's a micro HDMI port to connect directly to an HDTV as well as a proprietary USB port that doubles as a charging connection—there's no dedicated battery charger included, so you'll have to plug the camera into the wall to replenish its power. SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards are supported.

Despite its performance in lab tests, the main drawback of the Olympus XZ-2 is not low-light image quality—it's the price. At $600 it's a tough sell, especially when you can get our Editors' Choice Sony RX100 for only $50 more—it's got a bigger sensor that allows for SLR-like bokeh and produces cleaner images at high ISO settings. And, if you aren't tied to a compact camera, the same money can get you an entry-level compact interchangeable lens camera like the Sony Alpha NEX-F3 £599.98 at Amazon UK, and $700 will buy you a D-SLR like the Nikon D3200 SEE IT.

The XZ-2 does provide the option for an add-on EVF, which is a feature that few cameras in this class support—although shooters who want a viewfinder would be better served with the excellent optical finder that is squeezed into the Fujifilm X10 SEE IT. All in all, the XZ-2 isn't a bad camera, it's just one that's priced too high in a very competitive segment of the market.

More Digital Camera Reviews:
•   Canon EOS M50
•   Snapchat Spectacles 2
•   Phase One IQ3 100MP Trichromatic
•   Google Clips
•   Sony a7 III
•  more

Final Thoughts

The Olympus XZ-2 has a bright lens and captures sharp photos, but it's too expensive and photos start to show some noise as you notch up the ISO. - Digital Cameras

Olympus XZ-2

3.5 Good

The Olympus XZ-2 has a bright lens and captures sharp photos, but it's too expensive and photos start to show some noise as you notch up the ISO.

Get It Now
Best Deal£740.97

Buy It Now

£740.97

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio