PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

AT&T on Merger: 'We've Done This Before'

 & Chloe Albanesius Executive Editor, News

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

AT&T and T-Mobile are the latest wireless companies to join forces in a $39 billion deal that both companies say will help them better utilize available spectrum and more quickly deploy a 4G LTE network. But can previous wireless mergers tell us anything about what to expect from the AT&T-T-Mobile approval process?

In a Monday conference call about the deal, AT&T stressed several times that it has "done this before," and is therefore well-suited to handle a merger of this magnitude. In 2004, Cingular Wireless purchased AT&T Wireless for $41 billion. It closed later that year, and the combined company started transitioning the Cingular brand to AT&T in January 2007.

"We've done it before and we've proven that we can deliver," Ralph de la Vega, president and CEO of AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets, said Monday.

In approving the Cingular-AT&T merger, the FCC concluded that "the acquisition generally is not likely to cause competitive harm in most mobile telephony markets." It did, however, find that the deal might prove anti-competitive in 22 of the country's 734 cellular markets. The two companies were, therefore, banned from merging their mobile phone businesses in 16 markets - including Oklahoma City and smaller communities in Arkansas, Texas, and elsewhere. They also had to give up 10 MHz of spectrum in Detroit and Dallas, so that there would be enough spectrum for other companies to effectively compete.

The FCC required similar conditions when Verizon Wireless bought Alltel in 2008. The Department of Justice required Verizon to rid itself of 100 markets, while the FCC demanded that Verizon divest itself of another five to alleviate competitive concerns.

AT&T ended up buying the bulk of the Alltel Wireless assets that were divested by Verizon for $2.35 billion, selling some Centennial Communications Corp assets to Verizon for $240 million.

At the time, Democratic FCC Commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein expressed concern that a combined Verizon-Alltel would hurt small carriers that rely on roaming deals. "This development may put some small carriers out of business," Copps said.

Adelstein said he was "deeply concerned about consolidation in the wireless marketplace."

When asked if AT&T believed it would have to give up certain markets like Verizon had to with Alltel, AT&T chairman, CEO, and president Randall Stephenson said Monday that "our starting expectation is that no divestitures should be required, but we'll have to go through the process."

Another major merger of the past decade was Sprint's $35 billion purchase of Nextel in December 2004 - bringing the number of wireless carriers from five to four. The FCC approved it in August 2005, finding that "the post-merger market environment, there will be a continued presence of several other carriers with the ability to add subscribers and act as effective competitive constraints on the behavior of the merged entity."

Last year, Sprint said it will pull the plug on the once much beloved, but now essentially zombified Nextel iDEN network in 2017 as part of a complete overhaul of the carrier's many networks.

The FCC has not yet commented on the AT&T-T-Mobile deal, but in 2009, it kicked off a far-reaching examination of the wireless industry, asking stakeholders to submit comments on innovation and investment, the state of competition, and whether or not consumers get enough information from providers to make informed decisions about service.

Stephenson said Monday, however, that it believes the government will examine the deal on a market-by-market basis rather than the industry as a whole, and it is there that AT&T can demonstrate an "enormous" amount of competition in the wireless space.

"We'll certainly be open to having conversations and addressing concerns as they might come up," he said.

The Senate Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust, competition policy and consumer rights on Sunday promised to take a "close look" at the merger. On Monday, Rep. Edward Markey, who sits on the House Energy and Commerce technology subcommittee, promised to "evaluate the proposed merger of AT&T and T Mobile closely with a focus on how it would impact consumers, competition, and choice" and hold hearings on the matter.

About Our Expert

Chloe Albanesius

Chloe Albanesius

Executive Editor, News

My Experience

I started out covering tech policy in DC for The National Journal, where my beat included state-level tech news and all the congressional hearings and FCC meetings I could handle. I later covered Wall Street trading tech before switching gears to consumer tech. I now lead PCMag's news coverage.

My Areas of Expertise

Getting my start in DC means I still have a soft spot for tech policy; Congressional hearings can sometimes be as entertaining as a Bravo reality show, for better or worse. But PCMag is all about the technology we use every day, as well as keeping an eye out for the trends that will shape the industry in the years ahead (or flop on arrival). I've covered the rise of social media, the iOS vs. Android wars, the cord-cutting revolution that's now left us with hefty streaming bills, and the effort to stuff artificial intelligence into every product you could imagine. This job has taken me to CES in Vegas (one too many times), IFA in Berlin, and MWC in Barcelona. I also drove a Tesla 1,000 miles out west as part of our Best Mobile Networks project. Of late, my focus is on our hard-working team of reporters at PCMag, guiding and editing their robust coverage.

Read full bio