PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Mozilla Contemplates 'Do Not Track' Feature for Firefox

 & Michael Muchmore Contributor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Mozilla Contemplates

A month and a half after Microsoft made a splash announcing the Tracking Protection feature for its upcoming Internet Explorer 9 browser, Mozilla's Global Privacy and Public Policy Leader, Alex Fowler, published a post on his personal blog announcing a Firefox 4 feature with the same intent—protecting users from being tracked for targeted ads. Like IE9, Firefox 4 is still at the beta stage, and is expected to be released early this year.

To clarify this privacy strategy for end users, Firefox has published a Do Not Track FAQ on its wiki.

The Mozilla solution to the practice of online behavioral advertising (OBA), however, differs from Microsoft's in a couple of significant ways. Instead of merely being a browser option, Mozilla's feature wants websites to adopt a new approach when it comes to tracking their visitors. Fowler envisions each page request from the browser including a special Do Not Track header that will tell the sites just that.

"We believe the header-based approach has the potential to be better for the Web in the long run because it is a clearer and more universal opt-out mechanism than cookies or blacklists," writes Fowler. The idea stands in contrast to IE9's approach of using a block list of known ad trackers to protect users' privacy.

Both initiatives were likely prompted by an FTC report urging the Web industry to come up with tracking protections, and Fowler claims that the Mozilla solution better meets the FTC's desires. "The advantages to the header technique are that it is less complex and simple to locate and use, it is more persistent than cookie-based solutions, and it doesn't rely on user's finding and loading lists of ad networks and advertisers to work."

Of course, Mozilla's strategy comes with a big question mark: Will the advertisers buy in and respect the Do Not Track header? Fowler writes, "The challenge with adding this to the header is that it requires both browsers and sites to implement it to be fully effective. Mozilla recognizes the chicken and egg problem....We ask that sites and advertisers join with us to recognize this new header and honor people's privacy choices just as they are with opt-outs for OBA."

Between the need for site owner buy-in and the very fledgling state of the project, Microsoft's Tracking Protection seems like a better bet in the short term. Fowler's post includes an illustration entitled, "How Firefox's Do Not Track HTTP Header Might Work." The key word here is might. The strategy is reminiscent of the Do Not Call lists consumers have been able to enter themselves on to avoid being pestered by telemarketers. But that's backed up by national legislation, rather than based on an expectation of good will on the part of advertisers.

About Our Expert

Michael Muchmore

Michael Muchmore

Contributor

My Experience

I've been testing PC and mobile software for more than 20 years, focusing on photo and video editing, operating systems, and web browsers. Prior to my current role, I covered software and apps for ExtremeTech and headed up PCMag’s enterprise software team. I’ve attended trade shows for Microsoft, Google, and Apple and written about all of them and their products.

I still get a kick out of seeing what's new in video and photo editing software, and how operating systems change over time. I was privileged to byline the cover story of the last print issue of PC Magazine, the Windows 7 review, and I’ve witnessed every Microsoft misstep and win, up to the latest Windows 11.

I’m an avid bird photographer and traveler—I’ve been to 40 countries, many with great birds! Because I’m also a classical music fan and former performer, I’ve reviewed streaming services that emphasize classical music.

Technology I Use

For everyday work, I use a good-old Dell tower with 16GB of RAM, a 12th-gen Intel Core i7 processor, and an Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti GPU that runs on Windows 11. I pair it with a 4K Lenovo ThinkVision P27u-10 monitor and a Logitech MX Vertical mouse. For offsite work, I use a 2024 Microsoft Surface Laptop with a Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite processor. Camera-wise, I moved to mirrorless from a Canon EOS 80D with a Canon 70-300mm IS USM lens. I now have a Canon EOS R7 with a 100-400mm lens, but I miss my DSLR for several reasons.

In order of usage, the software I turn to most frequently is the Edge web browser, Slack, Adobe Creative Cloud, Microsoft 365, Firefox, Brave, and WhatsApp. I use the Windows Phone link app to see everything on my Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra phone, which has excellent telephoto capability.

For fitness monitoring, I have a Fitbit Charge 6 and use an Anker Smart Scale P1. I’m also a streaming fan, so I subscribe to both Amazon Music Unlimited (especially for its Dolby Atmos content) and Qobuz (for its high-res sound quality and classical catalog). I recently added a Vizio 5.1 Soundbar SE, which sounds surprisingly good given its low price. To holler commands instead of using a remote control, I have the Amazon Fire TV Cube in the living room, which lets me verbally tell the TV what I want to watch. It hooks up to an LG B4 OLED TV. I have a Sonos One speaker in my kitchen that also ties in with Alexa, as does the Echo Dot 2 With Clock in my bedroom. For serious listening, I have B&W 601 speakers plugged into a Conrad-Johnson Sonographe amp and preamp, with a Cambridge Audio AXN10 streamer as source. For reading, I also have a Nook GlowLight 3.

Read full bio