PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Motorola Q9c

 & Jamie Lendino Executive Editor, Reviews

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Motorola Q9c
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

Sprint's upgraded Q gives its subscribers an inexpensive, clear-sounding, multitalented smartphone, but a few flaws hold it back from true greatness.

Pros & Cons

    • Excellent value.
    • Good voice quality.
    • Includes GPS and EV-DO radios.
    • Robust software suite.
    • Very comfortable keyboard.
    • Bundled extended battery adds bulk.
    • Device feels a bit sluggish.
    • Middling camera.Watch the Motorola Q9c Video Review!

Motorola Q9c Specs

Screen Size 2.4

Since its inception, the Motorola Q has been successful. Versions of the popular slim handheld—originally billed as the "RAZR smartphone" at just 0.4 inches thick—can now be found on three carriers, with the device available in both CDMA and GSM versions. When Motorola revamped the Q, Verizon saw the new model first and branded it the Q9m. AT&T followed with its upgraded version, the Q9h, which bested the Verizon model with its excellent software bundle. Now Sprint finally has a new Q, and I'm pleased to report that the Q9c is a highly capable, inexpensive ($99.99 with a two-year contract, after a $100 mail-in rebate) smartphone, even if a few flaws hold it back from true greatness.

The Motorola Q9c looks a lot like its siblings except for one key difference—its battery pack. For some reason, Sprint trashed the RAZR-thin thing and decided to package all Q9cs with the extended battery. Now, my test unit scored a stellar 6 hours 56 minutes on a talk-time rundown test; that's easily the best figure I've seen on a CDMA handset. But the extended battery looks seriously bizarre. It sticks out sideways and adds both thickness (0.7 inches) and weight (5.2 ounces) to the Q's otherwise slender design. For those who want the original "standard" battery, it can be purchased for $44.99 from Sprint. But it crosses the line to make that the default option and mess with the handheld's slim profile.

Other design aspects fare better. The new keyboard is a nice improvement over the original; the Q9c's keys are larger and have just the right amount of quiet resistance for comfortable typing. The bright, 320-by-240-pixel display now includes an ambient light sensor. The thumbwheel on the right-hand side is a little stiffer and more recessed than on the original Q, but it's still usable. There's also a (nonstandard) 2.5mm headphone jack, a Back button, and a control area with six membrane buttons surrounding a responsive five-way control pad. Unfortunately, the Q9c still has the Backspace key above the regular keyboard.

As a voice phone, the Q9c excels. Test calls were clear and punchy, with plenty of volume. In one case, on a blustery day, the caller on the other end picked up a little wind noise but still heard me perfectly well. Another call had a slight buzz in the background. Overall, the handset sounded fine, particularly on my end, with a warm, full-bodied tone in the earpiece. When paired with a Plantronics Explorer 370 headset, the Q9c was clear if slightly computerized-sounding on the other end, but normal on my side.

The Q9c hits the Internet with EV-DO Rev 0 data; sadly, there's still no Rev A support. The handset uses the same Marvell 312-MHz processor as that of the Verizon Q9m and the original Q. It felt reasonably speedy in basic use but bogged down when switching between programs. Part of the problem is memory: There's just 50MB of internal storage and 25MB of RAM available for running programs, so keep an eye on the Task Manager.

The Q9c now supports Sprint TV, which offers dozens of channels. Live TV looked good, with smooth animation in full-screen mode; I averaged about 10 to 15 frames per second. Sprint's latest control panel for changing channels is simple to navigate and responds quickly. Sprint TV audio was distorted, however—the result of too much compression on Sprint's end. Another quibble: The volume control in Sprint TV works left to right, whereas in Windows Media Player it's up and down. I never got that straight throughout the review period.

The instant-messaging client is a welcome addition. It supports AIM, Windows Live Messenger, and Yahoo! Messenger accounts, but not Google Talk or ICQ. On my tests, the app was responsive and even logged in and out quickly. I also liked its collapsible buddy lists, and the ability to sign off from individual accounts as well as a one-button "sign off all and exit" option.

The built-in Internet Explorer displayed Web pages at a decent clip, although it's no Opera Mobile (which comes standard on the Q9h). The Q9c includes the excellent DataViz Documents To Go, which views, creates, and edits Microsoft Office documents and also handles ZIP archives and PDFs. There's also a GPS radio, and the device works with Google Maps and Sprint Navigation. E-mail support is robust as usual, since this is a Windows Mobile 6 phone; it works with POP, IMAP, and Microsoft Exchange accounts, as well as Direct Push e-mail.

The Q9c sounded surprisingly detailed when playing music on a set of paired stereo Bluetooth Etymotic Ety8 earphones. Stereo music sounded tinny but clear over the built-in speakers (the distorted audio issue occurs only with Sprint TV). The Q9c accepts media cards up to 32GB; my Kingston 4GB miniSDHC card worked perfectly. Video was another story—none of the Qs perform particularly well on our CorePlayer video benchmark tests, and we couldn't get acceptable frame rates on 320-by-240 video, only on 176-by-144 3GP-format files.

The Q9c disappoints in the camera department and is essentially unchanged from the original Q. It sports a 1.3-megapixel CCD and an LED flash, but no autofocus. The camera takes decent pictures, all things considered, with no glaring flaws aside from muted color; the flash doesn't do much, unfortunately. The phone also records the usual, near-useless 176-by-144 thumbnail-size videos at 10 frames per second.

Overall, the Q9c has the best balance of price and performance on Sprint. The Palm Centro is cute and costs the same, but it's not nearly as capable, and it's uncomfortable to type on. The BlackBerry 8830, our Editors' Choice, is a speedy, stable e-mail handler, but it's more expensive, and the Q9c beats it on document editing, instant messaging, and battery life.

The MOTO Q9c by Motorola is one of the least-expensive ways to get a cutting-edge smartphone on Sprint. At just $100 together with Sprint's data plans, which undercut Verizon's by an average of $25 per month, the MOTO Q9c offers plenty of value, power, and flexibility—not to mention good voice quality. With that bulky battery, just don't look at it sideways.

Compare the Motorola Q9c with several other mobile phones side by side.

Video
Watch the Motorola Q9c Video Review!

More Cell Phone Reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Motorola Q9c

Motorola Q9c

4.0 Excellent

Sprint's upgraded Q gives its subscribers an inexpensive, clear-sounding, multitalented smartphone, but a few flaws hold it back from true greatness.

About Our Expert

Jamie Lendino

Jamie Lendino

Executive Editor, Reviews

My Experience

I’ve been a technology journalist and editor for more than 20 years, including for PCMag since 2005. I've also written seven books about retro gaming and computing. Previously, I was the editor-in-chief of ExtremeTech. I’ve been on CNBC and NPR's All Things Considered talking techplus dozens of radio stations around the country. My articles have also appeared in Popular ScienceConsumer ReportsComputer Power UserPC Today, Electronic MusicianSound and Vision, and CNET.

Before all this, I was in IT supporting Windows NT on Wall Street in the late 1990s. I realized I’d much rather play with technology and write about it, than support it 24/7 and be blamed for whatever went wrong. I grew up playing and recording music on keyboards and the Atari ST, and I never really stopped. For a while, I produced sound effects and music for video games (mostly mobile and online games in the 2000s). I still mix and master music for various independent artists, many of whom are friends.

The Technology I Use

I’ve been cross-platform for decades, with PCs and Macs, iPhones and Android, Atari and Intellivision, NES and Sega…I’ve been doing this a while. Especially everything Atari, from the 2600 and 800 through the Atari ST, Jaguar, and Lynx. I bought my first 286 PC in 1989, the same year I bought my first issue of PC Magazine from a newsstand. I subscribed in the 1990s and upgraded to a 386, two 486s, and beyond.

Today, I use a 16-inch MacBook Pro, a custom AMD Ryzen 7 PC, and an Acer Nitro 5 gaming laptop. My phone is an iPhone 14 Pro Max. For music recording, I work in a variety of DAWs (and review them all for PCMag), but my main ones are Logic Pro and Pro Tools. I use an LG 27-inch 4K monitor, a pair of PreSonus Eris E8 XT studio monitors, Beyerdynamic and Sennheiser studio headphones, and a Focusrite audio interface. For my books, I use Scrivener, Microsoft Word, and Adobe InDesign and Photoshop. I also use a zillion emulators of old computers and game consoles for…work. 

Read full bio