PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Lexmark C544dn

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Laser Printers
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Lexmark C544dn offers the right balance of speed, paper handling, output quality, and size to fit nicely in a typical small office, workgroup, or busy home office.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Reasonably fast.
    • Ample paper handling.
    • High-quality output overall, particularly for graphics and photos.
    • Although text is easily good enough quality for most business purposes, it's a touch below par for a laser.

Lexmark C544dn Specs

Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 1 page, graph: 0:15 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 1 page, table A (with grid): 0:11 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 3 pages, charts and graphs: 0:36 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft PowerPoint 2003 - 4 full-page slides: 0:59 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Word 2003 - 2 pages, text: 0:14 (min:sec)
Color or Monochrome: 1-pass color
Connection Type: Ethernet
Connection Type: USB
Cost Per Page (Color): 12.8 cents
Cost Per Page (Mono): 2.4 cents
Direct Printing from Cameras: Yes
Direct Printing from Cameras: Yes (via cable)
Duty Cycle: 55000 pages per month
Input Capacity (printer input only): 250 sheets
LCD Preview Screen: No
Maximum Standard Paper Size: Legal
Network-Ready: Yes
Number of Cartridges: 4
Number of Ink Colors: 4
Photos - HIGH -QUALITY SETTINGS - Adobe Photoshop 7 - Average output time per print: 4" x 6" prints : 0:21 (min:sec)
Print Duplexing: Yes
Printer Category: Laser
Rated Speed at Default Settings (Color): 25 ppm
Rated Speed at Default Settings (Mono): 25 ppm
Tech Support: 1-800-539-6275
Tech Support: Base warranty - One Year
Tech Support: http://support.lexmark.com
Tech Support: Next Business Day
Technology (for laser category only): Laser
Type: Printer Only

The Lexmark C544dn ($499 direct) is one of the newest in a long line of impressive color laser printers from Lexmark. A little too large to serve as a truly personal printer, it's aimed at a small office, workgroup, or busy home office, with ample paper handling, reasonably fast speed, and fairly high-quality output.

If you were to go by the model number alone, you might assume that the C544dn is Lexmark's latest and greatest successor to the Editors' Choice C534dn. It isn't. It actually fills a less-expensive slot in Lexmark's line, replacing the C532dn. In short, it's a step down from the C534dn, not a step up. But the good news is that, like the C534dn, it's impressive enough to earn an Editors' Choice.

The C544dn's paper handling is one of its strongest points. The standard 250-sheet drawer, one-page manual feed, and duplexer for printing on both sides of a page should be enough for most small offices. If you need more, however, you can boost the capacity to 900 sheets with an option that adds a 550-sheet drawer and 100-page multipurpose tray ($199 direct).

If you don't need a duplexer, you can get the C544n ($449 direct) instead of the C544dn, but if there's any possibility that you might ever want to duplex the extra $50 for the C544dn is well spent, since Lexmark offers the same paper tray options for both models, but no duplexer for the C544n. Lexmark says that the two printers are otherwise identical, so most of the comments in this review apply to both. Lexmark also sells a wireless version, the C544dw ($599 direct), which is essentially the dn model with 802.11n Wi-Fi added.

Setting up the C544dn is a little different from setting up most color lasers. The printer is relatively small for a color laser, at 11.5 by 16.7 by 15.7 inches (HWD), and relatively light, at 46.2 pounds, so it's easier to move into place than most of its competition. On the other hand, there's more work than usual involved in removing the packing materials. You have to remove a side panel, remove the toner cartridges, and then put everything back together. None of this is hard, but it involves more steps than most printers require.

Beyond that, the C544dn also earns a slap on the wrist for its network installation routine. As with most printers, the process is largely automated, but you're asked some preliminary questions, including whether you want to connect wirelessly. Given that the C544dn doesn't support Wi-Fi, the question can only serve to confuse people.

Lexmark says it includes the question because doing so lets the company use the same installation routine for all three of the C544 models, including the Wi-Fi version. That presumably makes life easier for Lexmark, but offering installation options that aren't appropriate for the printer you're installing is simply asking for trouble. Fortunately, the worst I can say for either the physical setup or network installation issues is that they are fleeting, one-time annoyances. Neither counts as a serious flaw.

I installed the C544dn for a (wired!) network on a Windows XP system, but according to Lexmark, it also comes with drivers for Vista, Windows 2000, Server 2003, Server 2008, Mac OS 10.2 and higher, and Linux. In addition, you can download drivers from Lexmark's Web site for Windows 95, 98, ME, and NT; Mac OS 9.2 and above; and several flavors of Unix.

On our performance tests, the C544dn turned in appropriate times for its engine rating, at 25 pages per minute (ppm) for both monochrome and color. I timed it on our business applications suite (using QualityLogic's hardware and software, www.qualitylogic.com) at 10 minutes 16 seconds, essentially a tie with the directly competitive Xerox Phaser 6180N, our previous Editors' Choice, which completed the suite in 10:22. The two printers even delivered similar times for each test in the suite.

That said, the C544dn edges out the 6180N overall for speed by being much faster on our photo suite. It averaged 21 seconds for each 4-by-6 and 36 seconds for each 8-by-10, compared with 1:02 and 2:33 for the 6180N.

The C544dn's output quality is best described as one step short of stellar. Graphics and photo quality are both better than most color lasers can manage, but not quite up to the best available. Text quality is slightly subpar for a laser, but still good enough for almost any purpose.

More than half of the fonts in our text tests were easily readable at 5 points, with some qualifying at 4 points. Most of the fonts that qualified as easily readable at 5 points also qualified as well formed, but one of them needed 6 points to pass the well-formed threshold because of character spacing issues. Unless you have a highly unusual need for perfectly formed characters at small sizes, you should be more than satisfied with the C544dn's text quality.

Graphics were better overall than you'll get from most color lasers, despite a slight misregistration—blocks of some colors didn't line up perfectly, leaving a small slice of white between them. I also saw some slight dithering in the form of mild patterns in some colors, and posterization, with shading changing suddenly where it should change gradually, but nothing I'd call seriously objectionable. Most people would consider the quality good enough for anything up to and including marketing materials like one-page handouts and mailers.

Photo output was also better than most color lasers can manage. Some colors—particularly reds—in some photos were a little outside of a realistic range, but most photos were nearly true photo quality. Mount them in a frame behind glass and they would pass for traditional photos from a few feet away. As with the graphics, most people would consider them easily good enough for marketing materials.

The C544dn's combination of fast speed, high-quality output, and price doesn't quite leave the 6180N in the dust. In particular, the 6180N has the advantage on text quality and is still very much worth considering. That said, the C544dn has a slight edge on speed and price, and slightly better-looking photos. On balance, that gives it the advantage, and lets it squeak past 6180N as the new Editors' Choice for small-office and small-workgroup color lasers.

Check out the Lexmark C544dn's performance test results.

More Laser Printer Reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Laser Printers

Lexmark C544dn

4.0 Excellent

The Lexmark C544dn offers the right balance of speed, paper handling, output quality, and size to fit nicely in a typical small office, workgroup, or busy home office.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio