PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

iShield 2.0

 & Neil J. Rubenking Principal Writer, Security

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - iShield 2.0
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

With iShield 2.0, you and your little ones can avoid accidentally viewing porn images online. The software also serves as a browser-independent Internet time scheduler. Its porn detection is mostly accurate, but it won't stop a teen (or spouse) from surfing for prurient pix.

Pros & Cons

    • Detects and hides pornographic images on Web pages.
    • Logs violations.
    • Weekly schedule of allowed online time.
    • Associates Windows user accounts with protection profiles.
    • Easily circumvented by using off-brand browser.
    • Time scheduler may shut down non-browser programs.
    • Occasionally blocks non-porn images.

iShield 2.0 Specs

OS Compatibility: Windows Vista
OS Compatibility: Windows XP
Type: Business
Type: Personal

At the corner newsstand, they cover up the skin magazines and put them up high where kids can't reach. Guardware's iShield 2.0 tries to do the equivalent for pornographic images on the Internet. Using a complex algorithm involving skin tones, textures, limb positions, and more, it attempts to cover up porn and only porn. This new release updates the basic Internet-only iShield product to match the iShield Plus edition updated last fall.

After installing the product, you launch the password-protected control panel. For each user account on the computer, you select one of five profiles: Child, Teen, Adult, Default, or Off. The software comes with settings preconfigured for each profile, but you can tweak these to suit yourself. A protection-level slider lets you set the engine's sensitivity to Safe, Safer, or Safest. The higher the setting, the more images iShield will block (and the bigger the chance it will accidentally block non-porn images). Logically enough, this setting defaults to Safe for Adult, Safer for Teen, and Safest for Child.

The other big choice involves deciding what iShield should do when it detects dirty pictures. In "pasive" (sic) mode, it merely records the event without taking action. If set to Warn mode, it logs the event and pops up the cryptic warning "Suspected Web site detected." In Block mode, it covers up the image; if, when configuring the software, you check the optional Redirect box, iShield will redirect to a safe landing page when it encounters a page with a preponderance of porn. Finally, in Automatic mode, the utility can take any of the above actions depending on its analysis of the page's images. You can also build a whitelist of good sites and block access to all other sites, but I see little point in doing so. The Internet is simply too big for this to ever be a useful strategy.

By default, porn images get covered by a picture of a big shield against a jarring black-and-yellow striped background. This version lets you replace that picture with an image you select yourself—or rather, an image you have "selceted." Clearly, the app's developers need to invest in a spell-checker or a proofreader. These peculiar misspellings in the user interface may not impede the app's functioning, but they really do give it an amateurish look.

Internet time scheduling is new in version 2.0. As in Safe Eyes 5.0, you can define a weekly schedule of days and hours when Internet access is permitted. Any program that attempts Internet access during a no-access time will be terminated outright. But be warned: This feature can cause collateral damage. Suppose your child has several Word documents open for homework and happens to click a link in one of them. Poof! The utility terminates Word and all unsaved work vanishes. This feature needs refinement.

The software records all violations by all users except those for whom you've selected the Off profile. Clicking the Reports button in the iShield control panel produces a simple list of offending URLs along with the date, the time, and the name of the user responsible. If you're unsure why a site was flagged as bad, you can open the URL from within the report.

That's it for iShield's features; The Plus version adds others, such as category-based Web site blocking, IM monitoring, blocking of IM and P2P programs, and blocking of porn images outside the browser. Unlike Bsafe Online, Safe Eyes 5.0, Sentry At Home and SnoopStick, neither iShield edition offers remote management or real-time notification of violations. On the flip side, none of the other standalone parental control products even attempt to identify and block porn images. This utility is a one-trick pony, but it's a good trick.—Next: Spotty Coverage

Spotty Coverage

The software blocks porn images in supported browsers (Internet Explorer, Netscape, Mozilla, or Firefox) and now includes an option to prevent launching of unsupported browsers—or so it says. In truth, iShield blocks only a specific list of known unsupported products, such as Opera and Avant Browser. If your teen is smart enough to download and run an off-brand one that iShield doesn't recognize, then the image-blocking feature can't do a thing.

On the other hand, the time-schedule feature is browser independent. As noted, it will even terminate non-browser programs that attempt Internet access outside the allowed schedule. And if you turn on the option to get time information from the Internet, your kids can't fool iShield by tweaking the system time or time zone.

I configured the utility to block images using the Safe (lowest) level of protection and tried visiting various porn sites. Wow, there are a lot of them! But iShield did its job admirably; on many pages it blocked every single image. I found only one site that gave the software trouble—a site wholly devoted to artistic (but explicit) female nudes. At several pages on this site, iShield blocked only a few of the many images. To be fair, when I cranked protection up to the Safest level, the utility blocked them all. IE7 was significantly slowed, however, when trying to load pages with lots of images and crashed several times. Turning on the option to redirect away from a page with too many blocked images seemed to alleviate the crashing problem.

Do not try to go dress shopping or view your beach vacation pictures with iShield active. Few photos that include people in swimsuits will pass muster. The software also seems to have a penchant for blocking bare-shoulder dresses even if they're otherwise conservative. And even at the lowest protection level, iShield failed the "pumpkin test": Something about the shapes and color tones in photos of Halloween pumpkins confuses the image-analysis algorithm. I created a local Web page with two dozen photos of pumpkins and iShield blocked four of them. Still, it left the vast majority of non-pornographic images alone. And, of course, if you're a cucurbitophobe, you'll appreciate having iShield protect you from the dread orange gourds.

It's impressive how well iShield 2.0 manages to recognize naked people in pictures. The program will keep you or your little ones from accidentally encountering porn images on the Internet. It also blocks all Internet access on a schedule you specify. It's not as ambitious as the Plus edition, and as a result it's more successful overall. Keep in mind, however, that it won't stop a determined teenager from seeking out nude photos of celebrity hotties.

More Parental Control Reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - iShield 2.0

iShield 2.0

3.0 Average

With iShield 2.0, you and your little ones can avoid accidentally viewing porn images online. The software also serves as a browser-independent Internet time scheduler. Its porn detection is mostly accurate, but it won't stop a teen (or spouse) from surfing for prurient pix.

About Our Expert

Neil J. Rubenking

Neil J. Rubenking

Principal Writer, Security

My Experience

When the IBM PC was new, I served as the president of the San Francisco PC User Group for three years. That’s how I met PCMag’s editorial team, who brought me on board in 1986. In the years since that fateful meeting, I’ve become PCMag’s expert on security, privacy, and identity protection, putting antivirus tools, security suites, and all kinds of security software through their paces.

Before my current security gig, I supplied PCMag readers with tips and solutions on using popular applications, operating systems, and programming languages in my "User to User" and "Ask Neil" columns, which began in 1990 and ran for almost 20 years. Along the way, I wrote more than 40 utility articles, as well as Delphi Programming for Dummies and six other books covering DOS, Windows, and programming. I also reviewed thousands of products of all kinds, ranging from early Sierra Online adventure games to AOL’s precursor Q-Link.

In the early 2000s, I turned my focus to security and the growing antivirus industry. After years of working with antivirus, I’m known throughout the security industry as an expert on evaluating antivirus tools. I serve as an advisory board member for the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization (AMTSO), an international nonprofit group dedicated to coordinating and improving testing of anti-malware solutions.

The Technology I Use

Much of the testing I do, particularly testing with real-world ransomware, is just plain dangerous. To perform such tests safely, I sequester them inside virtual machines managed by VMWare Workstation. For cross-platform testing, I use a MacBook Air, a Google Pixel 4, and a 6th-generation iPad.

I rely on my Delphi coding skills to create and maintain small applications. These include programs to check whether an antivirus correctly handled the malware it detected, launch dangerous URLs and record the security program’s reaction, and analyze the malware that I collect for use in testing. I also wrote a tiny browser and text editor for use in testing security apps that have predefined reactions for known products.

I do my writing and research on a Dell OptiPlex desktop, relying on Microsoft Word (my fingers know all the shortcuts). Many of my articles include charts and analysis; Excel is my go-to for those. When work hours end, though, I escape the bounds of Microsoft and Windows. There’s an iPhone in my pocket, I relax with my oversized iPad, and my Kindle Oasis is always loaded with the best science fiction and fantasy.

Read full bio