PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Comcast Fined $2.3M for Overcharging Customers

The company added services to customers' bills that they did not order.

 & Tom Brant Managing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

The Federal Communications Commission today fined Comcast $2.3 million over allegations that the cable company charged its customers for services that they never authorized.

The settlement is the largest civil penalty the FCC has ever imposed on a cable operator. It stems from numerous complaints from consumers that Comcast was adding charges to their bills for premium channels, set-top boxes, DVRs, and other add-ons that they never ordered.

In addition to paying a fine, Comcast will also change its procedures for handling add-ons. It will send order confirmations for new services separate from the monthly bill, and it will offer the option to block new services or equipment from being added.

"It is basic that a cable bill should include charges only for services and equipment ordered by the customer—nothing more and nothing less," FCC enforcement Chief Travis LeBlanc said in a statement. "We expect all cable and phone companies to take responsibility for the accuracy of their bills and to ensure their customers have authorized any charges."

Comcast acknowledged issues with its past billing practices, but noted that the FCC settlement does not accuse it of intentional wrongdoing.

"We acknowledge that, in the past, our customer service should have been better and our bills clearer, and that customers have at times been unnecessarily frustrated or confused," the company said in a statement to PCMag. "That's why we had already put in place many improvements to do better for our customers even before the FCC's Enforcement Bureau started this investigation almost two years ago. The changes the Bureau asked us to make were in most cases changes we had already committed to make, and many were already well underway or in our work plan to implement in the near future.

"We do not agree with the Bureau's legal theory here," the statement continued, "and in our view, after two years, it is telling that it found no problematic policy or intentional wrongdoing, but just isolated errors or customer confusion."

About Our Expert

Tom Brant

Tom Brant

Managing Editor

I’m a managing editor at PCMag.com focused on PC hardware. Reading this during the day? Then you've caught me testing gear and editing reviews of Wi-Fi routers, printers, laptops, and tons of other personal tech. (Reading this at night? Then I’m probably dreaming about all those cool products.) I’ve covered the consumer tech world as an editor, reporter, and analyst since 2015.

I've covered most major consumer tech events, including CES, Computex, Google I/O, and IFA. I've also appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news.

Before I joined the tech-journalism ranks, I wrote on topics as diverse as Borneo's rainforests, Middle Eastern airlines, and Big Data's role in presidential elections. A graduate of Middlebury College, I also have a master's degree in journalism and French Studies from New York University.

The Technology I Use

While most people buy a phone or laptop and stick with it for years, I’m lucky enough to use devices based on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows daily as part of my job. As a result, I cycle through lots of tech in addition to my IT-issue work laptop. (Yes, that's a ThinkPad.) Personally, I’ve also owned a lot of tech products both cutting-edge and cringeworthy, from the Nintendo GameCube and the original MacBook to the Palm m105 and the CueCat.

Read full bio