PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

EU Official: Hyperlinks to Copyrighted Content Not Illegal

A website was within its rights to link to illegally published nude photos of a Dutch television personality.

 & Tom Brant Managing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Linking to a website that has posted copyrighted content without permission is not illegal, an EU court has advised.

The case at hand dates back to 2011 when a Dutch website posted a link to an Australian data-storage website that featured nude photos of a popular television presenter. The photos were owned by Playboy and the Australian site did not have permission to host them. The Australian site agreed to remove them, but they popped up elsewhere on the Web, and each time they did, the Dutch website linked to them.

The photographs were eventually published legally in Playboy magazine a month later, but the Dutch site was sued for continually linking to sites that hosted them illegally.

This week, Advocate General Melchior Wathelet told the EU Court of Justice that the Dutch site was within its rights to post those links.

The court has yet to issue a final ruling. Wathelet's advice is non-binding, but the court normally follows such advice, according to Reuters. A ruling is expected later this year.

It is a landmark case for the EU court, which previously ruled that linking to copyrighted content and embedding copyrighted videos is allowed if the copyright holder publishes the content publicly. But this is the first time the court has dealt with links to content published illegally.

Factoring into Wathelet's decision was his belief that courts should not interfere with links that facilitate "the functioning of the Internet."

He pointed out that victims of copyright infringement can still take legal action against websites that host or publish the actual content. "It is obvious that the copyright holder may bring legal proceedings for infringement of his intellectual property rights against the person who effected the initial communication to the public without his authorization," he wrote.

About Our Expert

Tom Brant

Tom Brant

Managing Editor

I’m a managing editor at PCMag.com focused on PC hardware. Reading this during the day? Then you've caught me testing gear and editing reviews of Wi-Fi routers, printers, laptops, and tons of other personal tech. (Reading this at night? Then I’m probably dreaming about all those cool products.) I’ve covered the consumer tech world as an editor, reporter, and analyst since 2015.

I've covered most major consumer tech events, including CES, Computex, Google I/O, and IFA. I've also appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news.

Before I joined the tech-journalism ranks, I wrote on topics as diverse as Borneo's rainforests, Middle Eastern airlines, and Big Data's role in presidential elections. A graduate of Middlebury College, I also have a master's degree in journalism and French Studies from New York University.

The Technology I Use

While most people buy a phone or laptop and stick with it for years, I’m lucky enough to use devices based on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows daily as part of my job. As a result, I cycle through lots of tech in addition to my IT-issue work laptop. (Yes, that's a ThinkPad.) Personally, I’ve also owned a lot of tech products both cutting-edge and cringeworthy, from the Nintendo GameCube and the original MacBook to the Palm m105 and the CueCat.

Read full bio