PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

InFocus Work Big IN24

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - InFocus Work Big IN24
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The InFocus Work Big IN24 delivers a reasonably bright, high-quality image for presentations and has unusually good sound quality, but it drops the ball on video.

Pros & Cons

    • Reasonably bright image.
    • Extraordinarily high contrast ratio.
    • Affordable price.
    • Unusually high-volume audio.
    • Native resolution is only SVGA (800 by 600 dpi).
    • Remote mouse control is optional.
    • Poor quality for full-motion video.

InFocus Work Big IN24 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Native Resolution 800 x 600
Rated Brightness 1700
Warranty 12
Weight 5.95

The InFocus Work Big IN24 ($699 direct) is one of the better DLP-based business projectors I've seen for the price. The SVGA (800 by 600 dpi) native resolution is suitable for simple graphics and PowerPoint presentations. The image is reasonably bright, with a high enough contrast ratio to make colors pop off the screen, and the audio is loud enough to fill a reasonable-size conference room. It doesn't do all that well with full-motion video—which may keep you from taking it home with you to watch the Super Bowl—but that's not usually an issue for presentations.

Measuring a substantial 4 by 12 by 9.5 inches (HWD) and weighing just under 6 pounds, the IN24 is bigger and heavier than I'd want as a constant traveling companion, but small and light enough to carry around occasionally. You don't get a carrying case with the projector, however, so you'll have to buy one separately. In fact, you don't even get a lens cap. InFocus says the lens is protected from harm by being recessed. But I'd feel more comfortable carrying it if the lens were covered as well. In any case, the unit as shipped is essentially limited to room-to-room portability.

Setup is typical. The projector comes with a power cable and VGA cable. Plug in both, adjust the manual zoom and focus, and you're ready to go. You'll also find a pass-through monitor connector, S-Video and composite video connectors, stereo RCA phono-plug input connectors, and a stereo mini-plug output connector on the back of the projector. I don't expect to see nonessential cables included at this price, however, and they're not. If you want to take advantage of the audio or video connections, you'll have to buy cables separately.

One feature I sorely miss in the IN24 is a remote mouse control, or at least the ability to press a button on the remote to move through a slide show. What makes this particularly maddening is that the projector is capable of controlling the mouse, and it has a USB connector for precisely that purpose. To use the feature, you have to replace the standard remote with one of several choices, at prices from $59 to $99. This is one corner that InFocus shouldn't have cut. I should at least have the choice of buying the projector with the remote I want, not being forced into one I don't want.

The IN24 does well on its core function: projecting an image. The rated brightness is a relatively low 1,700 lumens, but in testing it comes closer to that level than do some projectors with higher ratings. I measured it at 1,446 lumens, a substantial 85 percent of its rating—bright enough to project a reasonably large image in a well-lit room. The similarly priced Epson PowerLite S3 is rated at 1,600 lumens and delivers 1,255, a more typical 78 percent of its rating.

The more impressive number is the IN24's contrast ratio, at 472:1. DLP projectors tend to have high contrast ratios, but this is the highest I've measured for any projector. More important, it's enough to ensure crisp, eye-catching colors, even with plenty of ambient light in the room.

Image quality is also a plus, with the IN24 scoring well on our DisplayMate test screens (www.displaymate.com). I saw some moderate jitter that I couldn't get rid of by adjusting settings, but only on screens designed to bring out jitter. The only other issues were typical for single-chip DLP projectors. I saw the usual rainbow effect—with white areas breaking up into red, green, and blue when I shifted my gaze—but it was less noticeable than it is with many DLP projectors. Similarly, green and yellow were a little too much alike, with blocks of yellow going beyond the usual DLP mustard color to verge on olive drab. But here again, having a problem with yellow is pretty much expected for DLP technology.

As I mentioned before, the IN24 can't handle full-motion video. On my tests, skin tones were greenish, and the image was darker than it should be. The sound quality was good, however, with enough volume to fill a reasonably large conference room—a welcome feature if your presentations include sound. If you need a projector only for presentations, the InFocus Work Big IN24 is a great choice. But keep in mind that for the same price, you can find other projectors—notably the Epson PowerLite S3—that may not have as bright or high-contrast an image for presentations, but offer a more balanced set of features and can do a better job with video in particular.

Don't miss our projector comparison chart.

More projector reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - InFocus Work Big IN24

InFocus Work Big IN24

3.5 Good

The InFocus Work Big IN24 delivers a reasonably bright, high-quality image for presentations and has unusually good sound quality, but it drops the ball on video.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio