PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

InBoxer 2.0

 & Neil J. Rubenking Principal Writer, Security

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Security
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

If you like a hands-on approach to spam blocking and want to know why a given message was blocked or allowed, InBoxer 2 maybe just the thing. And we like the plug-ins that offer customized audio notifications and spam cleaning for your handheld e-mail devices. Still, other products manage to identify spam without requiring quite as much "audience participation."

Pros & Cons

    • Detailed spam analysis.
    • Filtering improves by learning.
    • Audio notifications of specific message types.
    • Blacklist and whitelist with optional import of Contacts.
    • Extra-cost plug-ins filter mobile mail.
    • Works with Outlook only.
    • Requires more user interaction than other tools.
    • Learning mode can decrease accuracy if user fails to teach it.

InBoxer 2.0 Specs

Type: Personal

Audiotrieve's InBoxer 2 strains out the spam from any POP3, IMAP, or Exchange e-mail account using Bayesian analysis. It works with Outlook 2000 or later (not Outlook Express) and supports all modern Microsoft Windows versions. And its plug-ins offer additional features you won't find in other products, some at no extra charge.

InBoxer's technology is derived from speech recognition, and like speech-recognition software, it needs training to learn precisely what you consider to be spam. It assigns a spam percentage to each message—under 15 percent is a ticket into the in-box, while over 90 percent gets the message blocked. (Advanced users can tweak these cut-off values). Messages with an in-between score go to a Review folder, which you must process manually, clicking on the "Keep" or "Block" button to rescue or trash each message. If the program allows spam into the in-box or blocks a valid message, you absolutely must correct it—otherwise InBoxer will assume the categorization was correct and learn accordingly.

To jump-start the learning process, you can supply InBoxer with folders containing examples of valid mail and spam. If desired, you can add a spam-percentage column to Outlook's display, or get a word-by-word analysis of any message. Adding a message's sender (or entire domain) to the whitelist or blacklist is a snap; you can also import your Outlook Contacts into the whitelist.

If your mail runs 90 percent spam, you've probably already turned off Outlook's new-mail notification. InBoxer's MailCall plug-in is a better solution—it provides audible notification only for good mail only, never for spam. The MailTones plug-in kicks the concept up a notch with the equivalent of custom ringtones for different message types. You might define one sound for a message from the boss and another for a message with "party" in the subject. The PopBoxer and Redirector plug-ins, available at extra cost, keep spam from reaching your BlackBerry or other handheld e-mail device.

Unfortunately, our testing ran afoul of InBoxer's learning mode. It took several days to review the initial influx of 10,000 messages, and doing so actually reduced overall accuracy. On instruction from InBoxer, we reset the learning module and trained the product in a more realistic way, reviewing incoming e-mail several times a day.

When we turned it loose to analyze mail without help, it was quite accurate about the messages it was sure of—it put less than 1 percent of valid mail in the Blocked folder and allowed less than 2 percent of spam into the in-box. But it put 38 percent of the valid mail and 11 percent of the spam into its Review folder. In practice, ongoing training should reduce the number of messages for review; judicious whitelisting would help as well.

If you like a hands-on approach to spam-blocking and want to know why a given message was blocked or allowed, InBoxer 2 may be just the thing for you. And we like the plug-ins that offer customized audio notifications and spam cleaning for your handheld e-mail devices. Still, other products manage to identify spam without requiring quite as much "audience participation."

More antispam software reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Security

InBoxer 2.0

3.0 Average

If you like a hands-on approach to spam blocking and want to know why a given message was blocked or allowed, InBoxer 2 maybe just the thing. And we like the plug-ins that offer customized audio notifications and spam cleaning for your handheld e-mail devices. Still, other products manage to identify spam without requiring quite as much "audience participation."

About Our Expert

Neil J. Rubenking

Neil J. Rubenking

Principal Writer, Security

My Experience

When the IBM PC was new, I served as the president of the San Francisco PC User Group for three years. That’s how I met PCMag’s editorial team, who brought me on board in 1986. In the years since that fateful meeting, I’ve become PCMag’s expert on security, privacy, and identity protection, putting antivirus tools, security suites, and all kinds of security software through their paces.

Before my current security gig, I supplied PCMag readers with tips and solutions on using popular applications, operating systems, and programming languages in my "User to User" and "Ask Neil" columns, which began in 1990 and ran for almost 20 years. Along the way, I wrote more than 40 utility articles, as well as Delphi Programming for Dummies and six other books covering DOS, Windows, and programming. I also reviewed thousands of products of all kinds, ranging from early Sierra Online adventure games to AOL’s precursor Q-Link.

In the early 2000s, I turned my focus to security and the growing antivirus industry. After years of working with antivirus, I’m known throughout the security industry as an expert on evaluating antivirus tools. I serve as an advisory board member for the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization (AMTSO), an international nonprofit group dedicated to coordinating and improving testing of anti-malware solutions.

The Technology I Use

Much of the testing I do, particularly testing with real-world ransomware, is just plain dangerous. To perform such tests safely, I sequester them inside virtual machines managed by VMWare Workstation. For cross-platform testing, I use a MacBook Air, a Google Pixel 4, and a 6th-generation iPad.

I rely on my Delphi coding skills to create and maintain small applications. These include programs to check whether an antivirus correctly handled the malware it detected, launch dangerous URLs and record the security program’s reaction, and analyze the malware that I collect for use in testing. I also wrote a tiny browser and text editor for use in testing security apps that have predefined reactions for known products.

I do my writing and research on a Dell OptiPlex desktop, relying on Microsoft Word (my fingers know all the shortcuts). Many of my articles include charts and analysis; Excel is my go-to for those. When work hours end, though, I escape the bounds of Microsoft and Windows. There’s an iPhone in my pocket, I relax with my oversized iPad, and my Kindle Oasis is always loaded with the best science fiction and fantasy.

Read full bio