PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Griffin Tunebuds

 & Tim Gideon Contributing Editor, Audio

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Griffin Tunebuds
2.5 Fair

The Bottom Line

For those who want to upgrade their iPod earbuds without spending much, Griffin's TuneBuds are a decent option, but even $30 seems a little high for what these earphones offer.

Pros & Cons

    • Inexpensive.
    • Offers some passive noise isolation.
    • Mediocre sound quality.
    • Flimsy design.
    • Intense cable thump makes it a poor choice for gym use.

Griffin Tunebuds Specs

Active Noise Cancellation: Passive
Type: In-Canal

I'm often pumped for suggestions of cheap, great-sounding earphones, and I'm sorry to report that there just aren't many. Typically, inexpensive earphones don't sound good. What they can do, however, is fit better and sound better than the abysmal earbuds that come bundled with every iPod. Griffin's TuneBuds don't offer much low end and sound a bit tinny, but they create a tight seal in the ear. This allows for some passive noise isolation and, at higher volumes, the illusion of more bass. If you're not an audiophile and are tough on your stuff—say, you've broken every pair of earphones you've ever owned—the TuneBuds (which are priced at either $20 or $30 depending on what color you buy) might work for you.

The earphones come in a variety of colors, presumably to match the iPod you own, but of course, they can be used with any audio device that has a 3.5mm jack. The black-and-white TuneBuds each come with an unexciting carrying case and cost $30; the colored versions don't bundle the case and sell for $20. They're lightweight (0.4 ounces), outfitted with rubber tips for a secure fit, and equipped with a 46-inch cable, which is just the right length. Based on the experiences of a friend who has gone through two pairs of TuneBuds and is currently on his third, I can tell you this: They're flimsily made, but, oddly, they seem to have a loyal following of repeat customers.

With the TuneBuds in ear and no music playing, enough sound is blocked out to make them useful on a train ride home, but they are no match for vastly more expensive pairs from Ultimate Ears or Shure that truly eliminate ambient noise. Sound quality is not a strong suit. The earphones are overly bright and lack bass, but they're still superior to the Apple earbuds, and they provide a far better fit. The seal helps create an illusion of deeper bass at high volumes, but you also get high-frequency distortion. They're not awful—they just sound like $20 earphones.

If the TuneBuds were $10, I'd tell everyone who hates paying a lot for earphones to buy three pairs and just replace them as they kick the bucket. At $30 with carrying case, they're dangerously close to the starting price range for good-quality earphones—so I recommend staying away from the white and black pair. Buy a colored pair for $20. If high quality is what you seek, Sennheiser makes excellent headphones and earphones starting at around $70. Shure and Ultimate Ears make top-notch pairs in the $100-and-up range. If you're really just trying to save a buck and you're sick of those blasted iPod earbuds falling out of your ear, however, Griffin's TuneBuds may be for you.

Griffin offers a one-year limited warranty on the TuneBuds. For technical support, visit http://www.griffintechnology.com/support.

More Sennheiser PX100 Reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Griffin Tunebuds

Griffin Tunebuds

2.5 Fair

For those who want to upgrade their iPod earbuds without spending much, Griffin's TuneBuds are a decent option, but even $30 seems a little high for what these earphones offer.

About Our Expert

Tim Gideon

Tim Gideon

Contributing Editor, Audio

My Experience

I've been a contributing editor for PCMag since 2011. Before that, I was PCMag's lead audio analyst from 2006 to 2011. Even though I'm a freelancer now, PCMag has been my home for well over a decade, and audio gear reviews are still my primary focus. Prior to my career in reviewing tech, I worked as an audio engineer—my love of recording audio eventually led me to writing about audio gear.

My Areas of Expertise

  • Headphones and earphones
  • Wireless and computer speakers
  • USB mics
  • Bluetooth headsets

The Technology I Use

Probably because of their prevalence in the recording studios I worked in a long time ago, I am most comfortable on Macs—I'm writing this on the 2019 iMac I use for testing. I also have a MacBook Pro that gets plenty of similar use.

My workspace has a mini recording studio setup, and the the gear I work with there is a mix of items I've used forever (Paradigm Mini Monitors and a McIntosh stereo receiver) and newer gear I use for recording and review testing (such as the Universal Audio Apollo x16).

I'm obsessed with modern boutique analog synths—some of my favorites instruments in this realm are the Landscape Audio Stereo Field and HC-TT,  the Soma Enner, the Koma Field Kit, and the Lorre Mill Keyed Mosstone.

From my studio days, I'm comfortable using Pro Tools, and in recent years have branched out to other realms of creative software, like Adobe Premiere and After Effects.

I stream music, but I also still buy albums, digitally or on vinyl, and encourage anyone who wants fair compensation for musicians and engineers to do the same.

I also play lots of Wordle.

Read full bio