PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Optoma GT760

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Optoma GT760 - Optoma GT760
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Optoma GT760 gaming projector won't let you take full advantage of the high resolution of the newest crop of game systems, but it delivers a short throw, a bright image, and HDMI 3D support.
Best Deal£398

Buy It Now

£398

Pros & Cons

    • Designed for game playing.
    • Short throw.
    • 3D with Blu-ray players and other video sources.
    • Native resolution is lower than today's latest gaming systems offer.

Optoma GT760 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1280 x 800
Rated Brightness 3400
Warranty 12
Weight 5.9

One of the few projectors specifically designed for game playing, the Optoma GT760( at Amazon) is both more and less than the Optoma GT750e it's replacing (with the GT750e still available at this writing). The only obvious addition in the new model is a small increase in rated brightness, to 3,400 lumens. Notably missing is the carrying case, second HDMI port, and impressively good sound system that the Optoma GT750e offered. Also missing is increased native resolution that would let it take full advantage of the most recent generation of game consoles. The result is a capable, but not particularly impressive, game-playing projector.

Optoma's website shows the GT760's resolution as 720p, which translates to 1,280 by 720. In truth, it's 1,280 by 800, which is a more common variation on WXGA. If you connect it to a computer, the higher resolution is also the better choice.

If you set the computer to 1,280 by 720, however, or use a game console at 720p, the projector uses just 1,280 by 720 pixels of its DLP chip. That keeps the aspect ratio at 16:9, and it also avoids scaling the image, which can introduce artifacts. If you set the source to 1080p, the projector also uses just 1,280 by 720 pixels on the chip. That requires scaling the image, but keeps the 16:9 aspect ratio intact.

Basics

Like the GT750E, the GT760 is designed to give you an immersive gaming experience, in part by being bright enough to throw a large image even with the lights on. It also helps that it comes with a short-throw lens, so you can sit close enough to the screen to fill most of your visual field, and not worry about casting shadows. For my tests, I used a 90-inch diagonal image with the projector just 42 inches from the screen.

Potentially adding to an immersive experience as well is that the projector supports 3D. Its HDMI 1.4a port lets you connect directly to a 3D-capable game console, cable box, or Blu-ray player for 3D games or movies. According to Optoma, it will also work at up to 1,280 by 800 (as well as at 720p) over a VGA connection with a 3D computer that uses a Quadbuffered, Open GL 3D-compatible graphics card.

Unlike the Optoma GT750E, the GT760 doesn't work with RF 3D glasses. I confirmed in my tests that it works for games with both earlier-generation 120Hz DLP-Link glasses as well as current 144Hz models. If you want to watch Blu-ray 3D movies, however, you'll need 144Hz glasses. Optoma says it also works with IR glasses, although Optoma doesn't sell any.

One other feature that's particularly important for games is a sound system. Unfortunately, the GT760 doesn't do as well on this score as the model it's replacing. Instead of the GT750E's two 5-watt speakers, it offers only a single 2-watt speaker, for a loss in both volume and audio quality. The audio is useable, and the volume is enough to fill a small family room, but for a truly immersive experience, you'll want to plug an external sound system into the audio output.

Setup and Image Quality

Despite coming without a carrying case, the GT760 is small and light enough to carry easily, at just 5.9 pounds. Setup is standard for a light-weight, short-throw projector, which means you have to move the projector itself to adjust image size and position.

In addition to the HDMI 1.4a port, connections for image sources include two VGA ports that can double for component video, and both S-video and composite video ports. Oddly, there's also a VGA-passthrough port for a monitor, a feature that's more useful for data projectors than for home-entertainment models.

Evaluating image quality for game playing can be a little tricky. Data and video images are different enough so that any given projector can handle either type of image well without necessarily doing well on the other. Games, however, share some aspects of each, which means that to show games well, a projector has to do a good job with both data and video. The GT760 manages that trick reasonably well.

On our standard suite of DisplayMate tests, the projector delivered good color balance in all predefined modes, with neutral grays at all shades from black to white, and good color quality in most modes. The one exception was the brightest mode, with most colors a little dark in terms of a hue-saturation-brightness color model. However that's typical for a DLP projector's brightest mode.

For 2D video, the GT760's image quality isn't a match for, say, the 720p Editors' Choice Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 750HD($1,495.00 at Amazon), but it did a good job maintaining shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas) and resisting posterization (shading changing suddenly where it should change gradually), even in clips that tend to cause problems. It also did an acceptable job with skin tones.

Some scenes in DVDs upscaled to 1080p showed moderate noise, particularly in solid dark areas, but in most clips the noise was minimal enough so it shouldn't be a problem. More important is that the noise was much less for both Blu-ray discs and games.

Rainbows and Other Issues

Rainbow artifacts, with light areas breaking up into flashes of red, green, and blue, are always a potential concern for single-chip DLP-based projectors. With the GT760, I didn't see many in data screens, but I saw enough in both video and games—particularly in dark scenes in Batman: Arkham Asylum—that they would likely be annoying for anyone who sees these artifacts easily.

Unfortunately, the GT760 is more of a step back from the Optoma GT750E than a step forward. The minor increase in brightness is hardly enough to notice, while the sound system is a significant step down in both volume and audio quality. What's more, even though Optoma says that the decision to drop the second HDMI port was in response to feedback from Optoma GT750E users, it's still limiting if you want to connect to more than one video source in a permanent installation.

It's also disappointing that this new-generation projector can't take full advantage of the improved resolution in the newest generation of game systems. Significantly, Optoma says it's planning to introduce a native 1080p variation on the GT series at some point. In the meantime, if you're looking for a projector specifically for playing games, the Optoma GT760 is a perfectly reasonable choice, but not a compelling one.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

Optoma GT760 - Optoma GT760

Optoma GT760 Review

3.5 Good

The Optoma GT760 gaming projector won't let you take full advantage of the high resolution of the newest crop of game systems, but it delivers a short throw, a bright image, and HDMI 3D support.

Get It Now
Best Deal£398

Buy It Now

£398

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio