PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

How We Test Monitors

What you expect to see from a PC monitor isn't always what you get. That's why standardized testing is an important part of the review process at PC Labs. Here's how we test every monitor we review.

 & Tony Hoffman Senior Writer, Hardware
 & Chris Stobing Senior Analyst, Security
Our Experts
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
(Credit: Joseph Maldonado)

We test desktop monitors of all stripes here at PCMag, from barebones budget screens to moderately priced mainstream displays to high-end, big-screen Ultra High Definition (UHD) models that cost thousands of dollars. Every monitor we review is subjected to a series of image-quality and performance tests that we use to draw a comparison to other monitors in the same class, which in turn helps us to assign a rating to each panel. Read on to see how we test monitors.


Basic Settings: What We Tweak, What We Don't

We first test all monitors in an out-of-the-box state. We do not calibrate the monitor or tweak color settings unless special circumstances require it, in which case we explain what we adjusted and why in the review.

To ensure accurate, comparable, and repeatable testing results, we use the monitor's Standard picture mode while testing and turn off all digital processing settings (such as dynamic contrast ratio, adaptive contrast, and color and black-level enhancers). The monitor is always tested at its native resolution via DisplayPort (assuming DisplayPort is supported). If it is not, we fall back to HDMI.

(Credit: Joseph Maldonado)

If the monitor has specialized color configurations built in (Adobe RGB, DCI-P3, and the like), we will also test those presets using the matching settings in our CalMAN testing software.


Our Testing Suite: The Gear and the Software We Use

To test monitors, we use Portrait Displays' CalMAN monitor calibration software, a Murideo Six-G signal generator, and a Klein K10-A colorimeter to take the measurements.

(Credit: Portrait Displays/PCMag)

CalMAN is a professional-level program most often used to calibrate monitors and televisions to be as color-accurate as possible. To that end, it comes with a host of tools that accurately measure color variance, luminance output, and overall color quality for any monitor we're testing.

(Credit: Molly Flores)

Hooked into CalMAN on our test bench via our testbed PC is the Klein K10-A, a colorimeter that we use to take the measurements directly off the surface of the screen. As an intermediary display device, we also deploy a Murideo Six-G signal generator to guarantee that all colors sent to the screen and scanned by the Klein K10-A are accurate to the color-space standard we are testing (Rec. 709, DCI-P3, and so on).


Testing Procedure: How We Measure What We Measure

To test color accuracy, we let the monitor warm up for at least 30 minutes, and we use the CalMAN software in concert with the Klein colorimeter to measure the monitor's color accuracy, compared with the sRGB, Adobe RGB, and DCI-P3 standards, and the manufacturer's claims about each.

To gather these results, we point our Klein directly at the middle of the panel using an 18% window size. (This is in reference to the size of the testing window relative to the full size of the screen.) We set a 3-second delay for each run (indicating the amount of time a color will appear onscreen, and when the Klein K10-A takes its reading).

(Credit: Joseph Maldonado)

We capture the color data, and CalMAN plots the results on a chromaticity chart like this one...

(Credit: Portrait Displays/PCMag)

Colored dots represent our measurements, while the boxes indicate the chromaticity coordinates. CalMAN also generates a percentage indicating the monitor's coverage of the color space in question, which we report.

After that, using the luminance sweep feature, we test the monitor's peak SDR and HDR luminance ratings, expressed as a peak lux figure in candelas per square meter (cd/m2, or nits). This process also gives us our gamma readings (a measure of the luminance level at which pixels on the monitor display colors) and the contrast ratio. We calculate the contrast ratio by taking the peak lux and dividing that number by the lowest recorded black level of the monitor.

Finally, if the monitor we're testing is intended for gaming, we use the Leo Bodnar 4K Input Lag Tester to measure its input lag times across various refresh-rate and resolution combinations. Low input lag is critical for hard-core gaming and esports, but you can benefit from it even if you're just a casual gamer.


Non-Quantitative Testing: Eyes Only

Our non-quantitative testing includes examining everything involved in the design of the monitor and its cabinet, while gauging it against competing models. This includes factors such as the overall aesthetic, the thickness of the bezels, the placement and selection of video inputs and other ports, the stand's adjustability and styling, and any VESA-mounting compatibility. We also report on the ease of use (or lack thereof) of the on-screen menus and their controls on the cabinet.

On monitors with HDR functionality, we watch some 4K test clips to gauge how well the content looks on the monitor. We also view a standard folder of high-resolution images to see how well a monitor might perform in Photoshop and other creative applications.

(Credit: Joseph Maldonado)

We test viewing-angle performance (how the display looks when observed from top, bottom, and side angles) by looking for any variations in luminance and color fidelity at various off-center angles. We use standard images to detect faded blacks in text, color shifting (where whites appear tan and reds may take on a brownish tone), and posterization (in which subtle grades of color disappear into broad patches). We also check for dimming and washed-out images when viewed off-center, both common issues in cheaper monitors.

About Our Experts

Tony Hoffman

Tony Hoffman

Senior Writer, Hardware

Since 2004, I have worked on PCMag’s hardware team, covering at various times printers, scanners, projectors, storage, and monitors. I currently focus my efforts on 3D printers, pro and productivity displays, and drives and SSDs of all sorts.

Over the years, I have reviewed smart telescopes, iPad and iPhone science apps, plus the occasional camera, laptop, keyboard, and mouse. I've also written a host of articles about astronomy, space science, travel photography, and astrophotography for PCMag and its past and present sibling publications (among them, Mashable and ExtremeTech), as well as for the former PCMag Digital Edition.

The Technology I Use

I have a Lenovo ThinkPad T14 laptop that's my work daily driver, an HP Pavilion Aero 13 as my primary personal laptop, and an Asus ProArt P16 for detailed photo work. (I also have an older Dell XPS 13, which now stays at home full-time.) For storage testing, I rely on our three custom-built Windows testbeds in PC Labs, as well as a 2024 MacBook Pro.

My primary home monitor is a BenQ EX2780Q, a gaming monitor with a great sound system and excellent image quality. I use that panel for writing, watching videos, and working with photos. I also have an HP 27 Curved Display—one of the first general-purpose curved monitors—which I have paired with an Acer Aspire desktop computer. My multifunction printer is an Epson Expression Premium XP-7100 Small-in-One. I also own an Epson Perfection V39 flatbed scanner, which I use for photos and short documents, and a Canon Selphy CP1300 small-format photo printer for turning out snapshots.

My first cell phone, in 2006, was a Motorola Razr; since then, it’s been all iPhones—I currently have an iPhone 15 Pro. I use my iPhone a lot for casual photography, though I also use a Sony DSC-RX100 VII and a Canon G5 X Mark II for everyday shooting. For much of my travel photography and astrophotography, I use either a Sony A7r II or A7 III, paired with a variety of lenses ranging from a Sony 14mm f/1.8 prime to a Sony FE 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS zoom lens. I also pair the A7r with a RedCat 51 for deep-sky star shooting. For astrophotography, I also use the Seestar S30 and S50 and the Unistellar Odyssey smart telescopes, which are essentially astronomical cameras controlled through one’s mobile device.

Read full bio

Chris Stobing

Chris Stobing

Senior Analyst, Security

My Experience

I'm a senior analyst charged with testing and reviewing VPNs and other security apps for PCMag. I grew up in the heart of Silicon Valley and have been involved with technology since the 1990s. Previously at PCMag, I was a hardware analyst benchmarking and reviewing consumer gadgets and PC hardware such as desktop processors, GPUs, monitors, and internal storage. I've also worked as a freelancer for Gadget Review, VPN.com, and Digital Trends, wading through seas of hardware and software at every turn. In my free time, you’ll find me shredding the slopes on my snowboard in the Rocky Mountains where I live, or using my culinary-degree skills to whip up a dish in the kitchen for friends.

My Areas of Expertise

  • Privacy software, including VPNs and proxy services
  • PC building, and all the ins and outs of desktop PCs
  • Processors and motherboards
  • Graphics cards
  • PC cases
  • Networking equipment
  • Internal storage

The Technology I Use

As a former PC component reviewer and longtime gamer, almost every PC I use is one that I've custom-built. I use a system that runs an AMD Ryzen 5 5600X processor, along with an AMD Radeon RX 6800 graphics card in a black case. For mobile devices, I'm a longtime user of Apple smartphones and am deeply integrated into Cupertino's app ecosystem, and currently I have an iPhone 10X.

Read full bio