PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson Stylus Photo 1400

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Epson Stylus Photo 1400
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Epson Stylus Photo 1400 prints high-quality photos at sizes ranging from 4 by 6 inches to an impressively large 13 by 44 inches.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Prints photos from 4 by 6 inches to 13 by 44 inches.
    • Claims 200-year lightfastness for dark storage, 98-year behind glass.
    • No memory card slots, even for transferring photos to your PC.
    • Not meant for all-purpose printing.

Epson Stylus Photo 1400 Specs

Color or Monochrome 1-pass color
Connection Type USB
Maximum Standard Paper Size Supertabloid
Number of Ink Colors 6
Type Printer Only

Some photo printers aren't truly photo-centric, but are good choices for general-purpose printing. Others are so finely tuned for photos that although they can serve as all-purpose printers if necessary, using them for text and graphics on plain paper is as much of a waste as using a brand-new Porsche to drive two miles to a train station every morning. The Epson Stylus Photo 1400 ($400 street) is in the second category. It's about as close as a printer can get to being a dedicated photo printer without it actually being incapable of printing on letter-size plain paper.

The 1400 is aimed at serious amateur photographers. It can print spectacular photos at sizes ranging from 4-by-6 snapshots to 13-by-44 panoramas. If you want to print at smaller sizes, you can do that too, but 4 by 6 inches is the smallest paper it can handle, so you would need to cut it down to size after you print.

Printing on large sheets of paper takes a relatively big printer. The 1400 weighs 25 pounds and measures 8.8 by 24.2 by 12.4 inches (HWD), not including the output tray that you can extend as much as 13 inches to the front to catch the large-size paper. Even so, the printer looks handsome enough to go well with most home office or hobby areas.

Setup is essentially the same as that of most ink jet printers: Remove the packing materials, load paper, snap in the ink cartridges, run the automated installation routine, and plug in the power cord and USB cable. As you might expect for a relatively expensive photo printer, the 1400 uses six ink colors—cyan, yellow, magenta, black, light cyan, and light magenta—with a separate cartridge for each, so you don't have to throw unused ink away every time one color runs out.

The 1400 includes a connector for printing directly from PictBridge cameras, but alas, no memory card slots. The issue isn't the lack of direct printing from cards, as most serious photographers would rather edit—or at least take a look at—their photos on a computer before printing. It's that card slots are convenient for moving files to the computer.

For any printer that's intended primarily for photos, the most important issue is photo quality, and that's precisely where the 1400 shines. It's not quite the equal of Epson's more expensive Epson Stylus Photo R1800, but it's in the same league, as well as being a close match to—and arguably better than—the also-more-expensive HP Photosmart 8750 Professional Photo Printer. The 1400 did nothing less than print every photo in our test suite at true photo quality, without a single flaw on the color output worth mentioning. The only significant problem I saw was with a monochrome photo, which had a distinct off-black tint and some minor posterization (shades changing abruptly where it should change gradually). If you don't care about printing in black and white, this won't be a problem.

Epson promises that the 1400's photos will last, claiming a lifetime of 200 years for dark storage—as in an album—and 98 years for photos mounted behind glass. Prints are also reasonably water-resistant, although they'll stain if you leave water drops on them to air-dry. On my standard torture test—holding a freshly printed photo underwater while rubbing it—I saw some minor bleeding into the white border, but no visible damage to the photo itself. You can feel comfortable passing photos around without worrying about someone ruining them with moist hands.

Graphics quality is good enough (no problems worth noting) for a graphic artist to consider using the printer. Text on plain paper, however, is below par for an ink jet, with fewer than half of our test fonts qualifying as easily readable with well-formed characters at 5 points, and none qualifying at 4 points.

It's a good thing that the 1400's photo output is worth waiting for, because speed isn't one of its strengths. On our tests, it averaged 2 minutes 3 seconds for each 4-by-6 and 4:29 for each 8-by-10. That's faster than the HP 8750, which took 2:29 and 5:20, but much slower than the Epson R1800's 1:18 and 2:42. The 1400's total time on our business applications suite was also slow, at 22:27 compared with 21:39 for the HP printer, which isn't particularly speedy in that test, either. But neither printer is meant for standard printing, so those times are largely beside the point.

In the end, if you want high-quality photos at larger than letter or legal size, the Epson Stylus Photo 1400 costs less than the competition and prints gorgeous photos (as long as you're willing to wait a little). That more than enough reason to put it on your short list.

Don't forget to check out our printer comparison chart.

Benchmark Test Results
Click here to view the Epson Stylus Photo 1400 benchmark test results.

More photo printer reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Epson Stylus Photo 1400

Epson Stylus Photo 1400

3.5 Good

The Epson Stylus Photo 1400 prints high-quality photos at sizes ranging from 4 by 6 inches to an impressively large 13 by 44 inches.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio