PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 - Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

Although it lacks the dark blacks of more expensive projectors, the Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 offers more than acceptable image quality at a budget price.

Pros & Cons

    • Inexpensive.
    • Vertical and horizontal lens shift.
    • No rainbow effect.
    • Two HDMI connectors.
    • Lacks the 3D support found in many current DLP projectors.

The Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 ($1,299 direct) isn't the least expensive home theater projector you can find, but it's Epson's lowest-cost 1080p model and certainly priced low enough to count as affordable. It also offers some useful features that less expensive projectors leave out, most notably vertical and horizontal lens shift. (Lens shift features let you move the image without moving the projector, giving you more flexibility in where you can place it.) Most important, it offers a reasonably high-quality image. Add all of these features together, and it's an easy pick for Editors' Choice.

The 8350 has a distinct family resemblance to two other Editors' Choice Epson projectors, the PowerLite Home Cinema 8100 ($1,499 direct, 4 stars) that it's replacing in Epson's line and the more recent PowerLite Home Cinema 8700 UB ($2,199 direct, 4 stars). As with its siblings, the 8350 is LCD-based. It also shares the same white color, a similarly large size at 5.7 by 17.7 by 15.5 inches (HWD), and a nearly identical weight, at 16.1 pounds.

The back panel also offers a similar assortment of connectors, including two HDMI ports for video or data signals. In addition, there are three RCA phono plugs for component video, a VGA port for a computer only (it doesn't support component video), both composite video and S-Video ports, a 12-volt trigger you can use to automatically lower and raise a screen when you turn the projector on and off, and an RS-232 port that lets you control the projector from a computer. There are no audio connectors, because there's no built-in sound system.

Setup and Performance
Setup is standard fare, except that the combination of the lens shift features and a 2.1 to 1 manual zoom make it particularly easy to find a convenient spot for the projector. If you want to put it on an empty shelf in the back of the room, for example, it doesn't have to be at a particular height or right at the center line of the screen. The horizontal lens shift can move the image roughly half a screen width left or right from the center position, and the vertical lens shift can move it almost a full screen up or down.

Epson rates the 8350 at 2000 lumens, which is unusually bright for a home theater projector. In fact, it could easily be too bright in theater dark lighting for the size image you'd likely want for a home theater. On the other hand, it means the projector is bright enough for, say, a family room with typical levels of ambient light. For traditional theater dark lighting, various preset modes as well as an Eco mode let you adjust the brightness to a more appropriate level if you need to.

Of course the key issue for any home theater projector is how good the image looks. As you might expect from its low price, the 8350 isn't a match for even moderately priced projectors like the 8700 UB, much less more expensive choices. However, it's certainly more than acceptable for watching full length movies or TV.

In my tests, the projector did a good job with skin tones and with maintaining details in both dark and bright areas, even in scenes that many projectors have problems with. I saw no motion artifacts, posterization, or other obvious image flaws. Blacks weren't the deep dark black that some more expensive projectors offer, but they were dark enough so I wouldn't count this as a serious problem.

3D and Other Issues
One issue that demands mention, as 3D is creeping more and more into the mainstream, is the 8350's lack of 3D support. You'll find 3D in many DLP projectors today, but not in the 8350 or in any other LCD projector as yet. So if you can't wait to watch movies at home in 3D, the 8350 would be the wrong choice.

On the other hand, inexpensive DLP projectors are subject to a rainbow effect, with light colors breaking up into little red-green-blue rainbows when you shift your gaze or something moves on screen. Some people are more sensitive to this effect than others. But if you, or anyone who might be watching with you, are sensitive to it, you'll want to avoid single-chip DLP projectors for watching full length movies. For the moment (for low-cost projectors at least), that means doing without 3D.

As long as you don't include 3D as a requirement, the 8350 is one of the most, if not the most, attractive home theater projectors at anything like the price. Its combination of 1080p resolution, 2.1 to 1 zoom lens, lens shift features, brightness suitable for use with relatively high levels of ambient light, and, above all, image quality, should be enough to grab your attention. It is more than enough to earn it Editors' Choice for a low-cost 1080p home theater projector.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 - Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350

4.0 Excellent

Although it lacks the dark blacks of more expensive projectors, the Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 offers more than acceptable image quality at a budget price.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio