PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson PowerLite 76c

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Epson PowerLite 76c
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

There are lots of reason to like the 76c, not the least of which is its price.

Pros & Cons

    • Reasonably bright.
    • Very good image quality.
    • Relatively light weight.
    • Low price for the resolution.
    • Well-designed onscreen menus.
    • Needed manual adjustment of the image in our tests.
    • The remote is hard to use.

Epson PowerLite 76c Specs

Engine Type LCD
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Native Resolution 1024 by 768
Rated Brightness 2000
Warranty 24
Weight 5.7

Although the Epson PowerLite 76c ($999 direct) offers XGA (1,024-by-768) resolution where the PowerLite S3 is just a VGA (1,024-by-768) projector, the two are similar in spirit. Both come at budget prices without serious corner-cutting. They're also reasonably light—the 76c weighs 5.7 pounds—and easy to take along, thanks to their included soft carrying cases.

You'll find the back of the 76c packed: Connectors include a VGA for a computer or component video, a monitor pass-through, an S-Video, RCA phono plugs for composite video and audio, and USB connector for mouse control through the remote. But the only cable Epson includes is one for computer VGA.

Setup is straightforward. We had to adjust settings both to minimize jitter and to reposition the image to avoid cutting off one side, but the process was painless thanks to the well-designed menu system, and the result was only a little shy of the rock-solid image a digital signal would produce. Zoom and focus are both manual and easy to adjust. Buttons on the remote are packed too close together, though, and labeled with such tiny letters that finding the right one can be hard, but that was the only issue we had with the control.

We measured brightness at 1,305 lumens, about 65 percent of the claimed 2,000, which is enough to stand up to typical lighting conditions with a reasonable size image. The contrast ratio was on the low side, however, at 126:1. The brightness variance of 1.27:1 was better than average, but the difference was enough for the bottom third of the screen to appear slightly brighter than the top on some screens—an observation confirmed by our measurements.

Image quality was good to excellent. Our DisplayMate test screens showed no major flaws, but we saw some minor problems—most notably a slight flicker in one of several patterns designed to show whether pixels are locked in place. Quality over both S-Video and composite-video connections was good, although it suffered from a little noise. The volume was loud enough to fill a small conference room, which is more than most projectors can manage.

The most attractive feature of the 76c is its price, but that's not the only reason we like it.

Check out our projector comparison table.

More projector reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Epson PowerLite 76c

Epson PowerLite 76c

3.5 Good

There are lots of reason to like the 76c, not the least of which is its price.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio