PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson PowerLite 1880 Multimedia Projector

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Epson PowerLite 1880 Multimedia Projector - Epson PowerLite 1880 Multimedia Projector
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

With its 4,000 lumen rating, the Epson PowerLite 1880 MultiMedia Projector can throw images big enough for a large conference room and bright enough to stand up to ambient light.

Pros & Cons

    • Bright, with a 4,000 lumen rating, but reasonably portable.
    • HDMI port.
    • 1.6x zoom lens.
    • Excellent data image quality.
    • Color balance issue in brightest mode.
    • Has problems with shadow detail (maintaining details in dark areas) in video.
    • Loud fan.

Epson PowerLite 1880 Multimedia Projector Specs

Aspect Ratio: 4:3
Built-In Speakers: Yes
Computer Interfaces: Analog VGA
Computer Interfaces: HDMI
Computer Interfaces: USB
Depth: 10.3 inches
Engine Type: LCD
Height: 4.2 inches
Keystone (Optical or Digital): Digital
Native Resolution: 1024 x 768
Rated Brightness: 4000 ANSI lumens
Rated Contrast Ratio: 2500:1
Remote Mouse Support: Yes
RGB Pass-through Connector: Yes
Supported Video Formats: 1080i
Supported Video Formats: 480i
Supported Video Formats: 480p
Supported Video Formats: 576i
Supported Video Formats: 576p
Supported Video Formats: 720p
Type: Business
USB Ports: 1
Video Interfaces: Component
Video Interfaces: Composite
Video Interfaces: HDMI
Video Interfaces: S-Video
Warranty Labor: 24 months
Warranty Parts: 24 months
Weight: 7.4 lb
Wi-Fi connectivity: No
Width: 13.5 inches
Wireless Connectivity: No
Wireless Remote Control: Yes
Zoom (Optical or Digital): Optical

Any projector that boasts the 4,000 lumen rating that the Epson PowerLite 1880 MultiMedia Projector ($1399 direct) offers is an obvious candidate for a mid- to large-size conference room or classroom. At that level of brightness, you should be able to throw an image that's large enough to let you see details easily even from the back of the room and still stands up to ambient light. The PowerLite 1880 lives up to that expectation and adds high quality for data images as well, making it a particularly good choice for the job.

Built around an LCD-based, XGA (1,024 by 768) engine, the PowerLite 1880 weighs just 7.4 pounds. That's a pound heavier than the DLP-based WXGA (1,280 by 800) Optoma TW762 ($1,100 street, 3 stars), another 4,000 lumen projector that I recently reviewed. However, the two are close enough in weight to share essentially the same level of portability.

Projectors in this general weight class are most likely to wind up permanently installed or on a cart for moving from room to room. On the other hand, they're also light enough for carrying with you at least occasionally. Optoma even provides a soft carrying case with the TW762. Epson doesn't provide one for the 1880.

Of course, the 1880 is much brighter than most people need for a portable projector. For that matter, even the 3,000 lumen NEC Display Solutions NP-V300X ($779 direct, 3.5 stars) is bright for a portable. In that context, the lack of a carrying case isn't much of an oversight. Still, if you want to use the 1880 as an extraordinarily bright portable projector, you'll have to buy a carrying case separately.

Connections, Setup, and Brightness

Setting the 1880 up is mostly standard fare, with a manual focus and manual 1.6x zoom. One interesting extra is a top and bottom digital keystone adjustment slider to supplement the digital left and right keystone adjustment. (Keystone correction lets you adjust the image to maintain a rectangular shape.)

The back panel offers a typical assortment of connectors, including an HDMI 1.3 port for a computer or video source, two VGA inputs for computers or component video, both S-Video and composite video ports, and both USB Type A and USB Type B connectors. The first lets you read data from a USB key or connect a document camera. The second lets you connect to a computer, both for sending data images and for controlling the PC's mouse pointer from the projector's remote.

The 78-inch wide (98-inch diagonal) image I tested with was easily bright enough to stand up to the ambient light in a typical conference room or classroom. With the lights off, in fact, it was too bright for comfortable viewing, although switching to Eco mode, rated at 3,200 lumens, solved that problem. Note too that with Eco mode the rated lamp life increases by a third, from 3,000 hours to 4,000.

Data and Video Image Quality

The 1880 delivers high-quality data images. On our standard suite of DisplayMate tests, the color balance was off in projector's brightest mode, with the brightest shades of gray showing a yellow tinge. However, it's not unusual for projectors to have color balance problems in their brightest modes.

Much more significant is that the color balance issue did not show up with other settings, and the projector sailed through the rest of tests without a problem. Colors were vibrant and fully saturated, both black text on a white background and white text on a black background were crisp and readable even at the smallest sizes we test with, and the image was rock solid with an analog connection even on screens that tend to bring out pixel jitter.

Video quality was usable for movie-length sessions, which makes the 1880 above par for a data projector on this score. However, it's well short of what you'd want for watching your favorite movie or TV show. I saw a moderately serious problem with shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas), with large areas of the screen turning into a solid black for scenes that tend to bring out the problem. On the other hand, the projector handled skin tones well, and I didn't see any posterization (colors changing suddenly where they should change gradually).

The fan noise also demands mention. I tend to be tolerant of fan noise, but found the 1880, with its 39 decibel rating, loud enough to catch my attention from my usual position when testing, sitting two or three feet from the projector. In Eco mode, rated at 35 decibels, it was easy to ignore. If you tend to be sensitive to fan noise, you may well consider this a problem if you're sitting near the projector.

On the plus side, the sound system, with its 10 watt mono speaker, is easily loud enough to fill a large conference room or classroom. The sound quality won't win any awards, but it's good enough so spoken words are understandable, which is more than you can say for many projectors in this weight class.

The Epson PowerLite 1880 offers far more to like than not, with a bright, high-quality data image, better quality video than most data projectors, better audio than most data projectors, and more. All of these pluses add up to making the projector our new Editors' Choice as an XGA projector for a large conference room or classroom.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

Epson PowerLite 1880 Multimedia Projector - Epson PowerLite 1880 Multimedia Projector

Epson PowerLite 1880 Multimedia Projector

4.0 Excellent

With its 4,000 lumen rating, the Epson PowerLite 1880 MultiMedia Projector can throw images big enough for a large conference room and bright enough to stand up to ambient light.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio