PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson Perfection V750-M Pro

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Epson Perfection V750-M Pro
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

Aimed at professionals and serious amateur photographers, the Epson Perfection V750-M Pro delivers top-quality scans for photographic prints and film.

Pros & Cons

    • High-quality scans.
    • Fluid-mount kit for hiding scratches in black-and-white film.
    • For some images, Epson's own driver gives poorer scan results than the bundled alternative SilverFast driver.

Epson Perfection V750-M Pro Specs

Automatic Document Feeder
Ethernet Interface
Film Scanning
Flatbed
Maximum Optical Resolution 6400 pixels
Maximum Scan Area Letter
Mechanical Resolution 9600

The Epson Perfection V750-M Pro ($799.99 direct) shares most of its traits with the Epson Perfection V700 Photo. Both claim an optical resolution of 6,400 pixels per inch (ppi); both deliver among the best-quality scans I've ever seen; and both cost enough to be of interest only to serious photographers, particularly those with a large library of negatives and slides to digitize. But where the target market for the V700 is the serious amateur photographer, the V750-M goes one step further, aiming at both serious amateurs and professionals.

The difference in emphasis shows in the V750-M's better optics, with an antireflective coating on the CCD lens and a high-reflectivity mirror. This gives the V750 better resolution than the V700 in terms of the ability to resolve detail, despite the same 6,400-ppi rating for both scanners.

The V750 also comes with an additional tool for removing scratches—a fluid-mount kit. Both scanners include Digital ICE, which combines hardware and software to remove scratches digitally. But although Digital ICE works impressively well on color images, it doesn't do much for black-and-white film. That's where the fluid-mount kit comes in.

You've probably noticed that some scratches—on a polyurethaned wood floor, for example—disappear when you wet the floor with a cleaning solution, only to reappear when the floor dries. If you took a photo of the floor when it was wet, however, you wouldn't see the scratch. The fluid-mount kit works much the same way. Put the mounting solution—available from Aztek—on the mounting kit's glass plate, place the negative on the fluid to fill in the scratches, and put a few more drops on top of the film, a piece of Mylar (also available from Aztek) on top of that, and scan.

It took me three tries to learn how much fluid to use, but once I got the hang of it, the result was indeed noticeably better than with Digital ICE for scratches on a black-and-white negative. However, the mounting fluid is not user-friendly. Epson warns that you should avoid letting it make contact with your skin or eyes, and use it only in a well-ventilated area. (Another reason why the V750-M is best reserved for serious photographers.)

In most other ways, the V750-M is similar to the V700. It ships with the same five templates for eight different film formats—35mm slides, 35mm strips of film, and 2.25-inch, 6- by 20-cm, 4- by 5-inch, 120, 220, and 8- by 10-inch—and it uses the same familiar Epson driver, with several modes: Automatic; Home (with controls for a few basic settings such as brightness); and Professional (with controls for color balance, saturation, and tonal curve adjustments to bring out more detail in dark areas, for example). You also get a fourth choice: LaserSoft's SilverFast SE Ai version 6 scan utility, which offers even more sophisticated tools for things like adjusting color. All three modes in the Epson driver offer automatic color restoration for faded images. The Home and Professional modes, as well as SilverFast, support Digital ICE.

The V750-M lived up to its promise scanning our standard set of 35mm slides. At both our standard 2,400-ppi scan and the maximum 6,400 ppi, it not only resolved appropriate detail for the resolution, but did a visibly better job than the V700. It also did well on dynamic range, the ability to retain all the steps in shading from white to black. But on one particularly demanding slide, with a dark tree line against a light sky, it wasn't quite a match for the Editors' Choice Canon CanoScan 9950F. More precisely, it wasn't even close when using Epson's own driver, but I got a much better result using SilverFast combined with the bundled Monaco EZcolor in a separate step after scanning.

The V750-M also did an excellent job with photographic prints, which is no surprise, given that slides demand a much higher resolution and dynamic range than prints need. And it did superbly on speed. I timed it at just 12 to 19 seconds to scan a 4-by-6 at 300 and 400 ppi, respectively, and roughly 35 seconds to scan one slide at 2,400 ppi—far faster than either the V700 or CanoScan 9950F.

When I reviewed the Epson V700, I said that it didn't offer enough to replace the less expensive 4,800-ppi 9950F as Editors' Choice. But I also said that because of the higher resolution and the flexibility to scan film as large as 8-by-10, compared with only 4-by-5 for the 9950F, it might be your preferred scanner. Much the same holds true for the Epson Perfection V750-M Pro, only more so, as it offers the same flexibility as the V700 for film formats, even better resolution, and the fluid-mount kit as an extra tool in your arsenal for removing scratches.

Don't miss our scanner comparison chart.

More scanner reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Epson Perfection V750-M Pro

Epson Perfection V750-M Pro

4.0 Excellent

Aimed at professionals and serious amateur photographers, the Epson Perfection V750-M Pro delivers top-quality scans for photographic prints and film.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio