PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Epson Perfection 4180 Photo

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Epson Perfection 4180 Photo
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

The Epson Perfection 4180 Photo scanner offers better photo scan quality for both prints and film than most flatbed scanners. And the claimed 4,800-ppi optical resolution is more than most people will ever need. We've seen as good or better scans from less expensive scanners, however.

Pros & Cons

    • Better scan quality than most flatbed scanners, particularly for slides.
    • Color restore feature for faded photos.
    • Claimed 4,800 pixel-per-inch (ppi) optical resolution.
    • Dust and grain reduction features work with film only.
    • OCR program had trouble reading Times New Roman fonts.

Epson Perfection 4180 Photo Specs

Automatic Document Feeder: No
Ethernet Interface: No
Flatbed: Yes
Maximum Optical Resolution: 4800 pixels
Maximum Scan Area: Legal
Mechanical Resolution: 9600 pixels
One-Touch Buttons: Yes
Scanning Options: Reflective
Scanning Options: Transparency
USB or FireWire Interface: USB

Add the Epson Perfection 4180 Photo ($250 street) to the small but growing list of flatbed scanners that takes film scanning seriously. It's designed, in part, to scan not just 35-mm slides and film but medium-format film, including 2.25-inch, 120, and 6- by 6-centimeter formats. And it does a more than credible job, with scan quality scores at the high end of good for prints and good for slides, along with overall scores of good for photos and very good for slides.

The claimed 4,800-ppi optical resolution is overkill for most purposes. Scan a 35-mm slide at 4,800 by 4,800 ppi, resize the image to print at even 11 by 17 inches, and the image resolution will be over 300 ppi, much higher than will make any difference in the printed output. That said, the higher a scanner's maximum resolution, the more likely it will deliver at lower resolutions, like the 2,400 ppi you might realistically use for scanning a slide. And indeed, the 4180 resolved detail better than the current Editors' Choice, the CanoScan 8400F

Unfortunately, the 4180 falls short of the 8400F on dynamic range, as indicated by its inability to retain details based on differences in shading. In one slide with a dark tree line against a bright sky, for example, the 8400F scan retained virtually all of the detail. In the 4180 scan, much of the detail in the tree line disappeared in a solid mass of black.

One nice touch that the 4180 shares with the Epson Perfection 2580 Photo is an automatic mode that prescans, adjusts settings based on the scan target, and then scans. We timed it at 29 to 34.2 seconds for a 4-by-6-inch photo at 300 ppi. Scanning the same photo manually at 400 ppi took 7 seconds for the prescan, and 19.7 seconds for the scan. Scanning a slide at 2,400 ppi took a somewhat sluggish 1:25.

Performance on our OCR tests was uneven. The scanner's bundled software, Abbyy FineReader Sprint OCR, read Arial fonts as small as 6 points without a mistake but had trouble with all Times New Roman fonts smaller than 12 points. Similarly, the bundled business card reader, Newsoft Presto! Bizcard, tripped up on some card formats.

Neither of the aforementioned issues is major, but they don't help make the case for the 4180 either. And although we like the 4180, it's hard to recommend unreservedly with the CanoScan 8400F offering equally good, if not better, scans at less than half the price.

Sub-ratings:
Photos:
Slides:
Business cards:
OCR:

More scanner reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Epson Perfection 4180 Photo

Epson Perfection 4180 Photo

3.0 Average

The Epson Perfection 4180 Photo scanner offers better photo scan quality for both prints and film than most flatbed scanners. And the claimed 4,800-ppi optical resolution is more than most people will ever need. We've seen as good or better scans from less expensive scanners, however.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio