PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Dell 4320

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Light enough to carry as a regular traveling companion for business, the Dell 4320 projector delivers a bright image, WXGA (1,280-by-800) resolution, and near-excellent data-image quality. - Dell 4320
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

Light enough to carry as a regular traveling companion for business, the Dell 4320 projector delivers a bright image, WXGA (1,280-by-800) resolution, and near-excellent data image quality.
Best Deal£953

Buy It Now

£953

Pros & Cons

    • High brightness, at 4,300 lumens.
    • Reasonably high-quality data and usable video.
    • Light.
    • Comes with carrying case.
    • 3D support for computers only.

Dell 4320 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Inputs and Interfaces USB
Native Resolution 1280 x 800
Rated Brightness 4300
Warranty 24
Weight 6.4

If you need a WXGA (1,280-by-800) projector for business or educational use that's light enough to carry with you and bright enough to throw an image suitable for a mid- to large-size room, add the Dell 4320 ($1,499) to your list of potential choices. Rated at 4,300 lumens, it's very much in the same class as, for example, the Optoma W401, making it of particular interest to anyone who needs a brighter than typical portable projector.

Like the W401, the 4320 weighs 6 pounds 6 ounces, which is a little heavy to count as easily portable, particularly given the relatively large size, at 4.3 by 11.2 by 9.7 inches (HWD). In fact, most projectors that weigh this much wind up permanently installed or mounted on a cart. However, it's light enough to carry with you if you need to, and Dell even ships it with a soft carrying case, to make it a little easier.

The other key feature the 4320 shares with the Optoma W401 is that it's unusually bright for the weight. In comparison, the Editors' Choice NEC NP-M311W, is a bit heavier and is rated at only 3,100 lumens. These ratings aren't entire comparable, because the 4320 and Optoma W401 are DLP-based while the NEC NP-M311W is LCD-based. (More on that below.) But to the extent that you can compare them, the 4320 obviously delivers more lumens for the weight.

Connections and Setup

Setting up the 4320 is typical for the breed, with a manual focus and a 1.2x manual zoom, which is enough to offer some flexibility in how far you can put the projector from the screen for any given size image. For the 92-inch diagonal image I used in my tests, and using the maximum zoom, I measured the distance at 102 inches.

Image inputs on the back panel include the usual HDMI, VGA, and composite video ports, with the two VGA ports also working for component video. In addition there's an S-Video port, a USB B port for direct USB display, and a USB A port for reading files directly from a USB key. You can also get an optional Wi-Fi dongle ($69.99), which plugs into the USB A port, to connect by Wi-Fi.

According to Dell, you can send data to the projector over its LAN port as well, but only if you have the Wi-Fi dongle installed. Without it, you can use the port only for controlling the projector over the network. Also note that although the projector offers 3D support, the 3D is limited to working with computers equipped with quad-buffered, Open GL 3D-compatible graphics cards.

Brightness

As with most DLP-based data projectors, the 4320 has a different white brightness than color brightness, which complicates any attempt to compare its brightness to the competition. (For a discussion of color brightness, see Color Brightness: What It Is, Why It Matters.)

Dell 4320

As a point of reference, using SMPTE (Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers) recommendations, 4,300 lumens with WXGA resolution would be bright enough for roughly a 250- to 340-inch diagonal image in theater-dark lighting, assuming a 1.0 gain screen. In moderate ambient light, it would be suitable for roughly a 165- to 185-inch image.

Various preset modes, as well as Eco mode, also let you lower the brightness for smaller screen sizes or lower light levels. Even with the 92-inch diagonal image I used for testing, I had no problem finding a comfortable brightness for viewing in either theater dark lighting or moderate ambient light.

Image Quality

The 4230's data-image quality on my tests was a little short of excellent, but good enough for most purposes. On our standard suite of DisplayMate images, the projector did a good job with color balance in all preset modes, with suitably neutral grays at all shades from black to white. Red, blue, and yellow were a little dark in some preset modes in terms of a hue-saturation-brightness color model, but colors were nicely saturated and suitably eye-catching.

More important for most data screens, the projector held detail well. Both black text on white and white text on black was highly readable at sizes as small as 6.8 points. I saw some minor dynamic moire patterns in some images designed to bring them out. However, unless you use patterned fills rather than solid blocks of color in your graphics, you'll probably never see this issue.

For video, the WXGA native resolution lets the 4320 show widescreen 720p input without scaling, and the projector did a good job with shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas). Image quality suffers from an obviously low contrast ratio and, with some clips, a high noise level. However, the video is at least watchable for long sessions, which is more than you can say for many data projectors.

Very much on the plus side, the 4320 doesn't show many rainbow artifacts—with light areas breaking up into flashes of red, green, and blue—with either video or data screens. Even if you see these artifacts easily, it's unlikely that you'll see them often enough to find them annoying.

One other plus is the stereo sound system. The two 5-watt speakers are too close together to offer any stereo effect, but they deliver good sound quality with enough volume to easily fill a mid-size room. For still better audio, you can plug an external sound system into the audio output on the back panel.

If you have no tolerance for seeing rainbow artifacts, you'll be better off with an LCD-based projector like the Editors' Choice NEC NP-M311W. But if you don't mind an occasional rainbow in the image, and need a bright, WXGA data projector—particularly one that's light enough to carry easily, the Dell 4320 is certainly worth considering. It offers light weight, a bright image, near-excellent data-image quality, watchable video, and far better audio than most projectors in its weight class. Depending on your needs, the balance of features can easily make it a more than attractive choice.

Final Thoughts

Light enough to carry as a regular traveling companion for business, the Dell 4320 projector delivers a bright image, WXGA (1,280-by-800) resolution, and near-excellent data-image quality. - Dell 4320

Dell 4320

3.5 Good

Light enough to carry as a regular traveling companion for business, the Dell 4320 projector delivers a bright image, WXGA (1,280-by-800) resolution, and near-excellent data image quality.

Get It Now
Best Deal£953

Buy It Now

£953

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio