PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Dell 1200MP

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Dell 1200MP
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

Small and lightweight, with a bright, high-quality image, the Dell 1200MP is a comfortable traveling companion and a great choice for presentations.

Pros & Cons

    • Scores well on brightness, contrast ratio, image quality for presentations, and audio.
    • Reasonably portable.
    • Image quality for full-motion video is less than ideal.

Dell 1200MP Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Native Resolution 800 x 600
Rated Brightness 2000
Warranty 12
Weight 4.94

One of the big differences between computer monitors and projectors is what counts as acceptable resolution. On the desktop and in notebooks, SVGA (800 by 600 pixels) is essentially obsolete. For projectors, however, it's still a good choice for things like simple Excel charts and PowerPoint presentations. That and the lower price for SVGA projectors are enough to keep them in the running. And the DLP-based Dell 1200MP Projector ($699 direct) is the best I've seen in the category.

Weighing in at a smidge under five pounds (4.94 pounds to be precise), and measuring 4 by 9.9 by 8.4 inches (HWD), the 1200MP is just small and light enough so I wouldn't mind carrying it around on a regular basis. And it certainly doesn't hurt that it comes with its own soft carrying case. Call it a comfortable, if not superb, traveling companion.

Dell also earns praise for not cutting corners that other manufacturers cut as a matter of course. Unlike most projectors, the 1200MP comes with a printed manual—not a PDF file—and all the cables you need, including a VGA cable to connect to your graphics card; three video cables to connect to an S-Video, composite-video, or component-video source; two audio cables, to connect to either an audio output with a miniplug or one that needs RCA phono plugs; and a USB cable to connect to your computer so you can use the remote to page through a presentation.

The one corner Dell does cut is leaving out full mouse control—at least with the remote that it ships with. According to Dell, the projector supports mouse control, but you have to buy the remote ($59.99 direct) that normally comes with the Dell 3400MP. In most cases, however, paging through a presentation is the only control you really need.

Setup is standard fare. Plug in the power cord and cables you want to connect, turn everything on, and adjust the manual-focus and zoom-ring controls. I found both controls well designed, with good tactile feedback and firm control, making it easy to find the right setting without overshooting it.

The 1200MP also did well on brightness and contrast. I measured the brightness at 1,850 lumens, easily enough to stand up to typical ambient lighting with a reasonably large image. It's also worth mentioning that the 1200MP delivers a much higher percentage of the claimed brightness than most projectors manage, at 93 percent of its 2,000-lumen rating. The similarly priced Epson PowerLite S3 for example, scored a more typical 78 percent of its 1,600-lumen rating on my tests, at 1,255 lumens. DLP projectors tend to do well on contrast ratio, but the 1200MP's measured 339:1 is still excellent for one. And it's enough to ensure that colors will pop off the screen, even with plenty of ambient light in the room.

The 1200MP also did well on our DisplayMate test screens (www.displaymate.com). The image was as rock-solid as it would be with a digital connection, with no visible jitter even on images designed to bring out jitter. The only issues were typical for a single-chip DLP projector: Yellow was shifted a little to a mustard color, though not as badly as with many DLP projectors I've seen; and, as is typical for the technology, I saw some rainbow effect, with white areas breaking up into red, green, and blue when I shifted my gaze.

The projector didn't do as well on full-motion video. When playing a DVD over an S-Video connection, the image was reasonably bright, with acceptable flesh tones, but colors were a little punchy, and essentially straight edges like the line of a shoulder turned into rippled edges. I also saw a halo of sorts surrounding people's heads on closeups, mostly when the background was blue, with the halo a brighter blue. But this is a decidedly secondary application for a business projector. And even though I wouldn't recommend the 1200MP for a home theater, it's good enough to bring home occasionally to watch a movie or sporting event.

Sound quality was more acceptable, with enough volume to fill a small conference room. That's louder than most projectors, but for a larger audience, you'll still need an external sound system.

Even with the less than ideal quality for full-motion video, the 1200MP is an impressive package. It offers the best value and best balance of features in its class, with good portability, a full set of cables, and better full-motion video quality than you'll get from, for example, the similarly priced InFocus Work Big IN24. And for presentations, it's way out in front of the competition, with the best overall score for brightness, contrast, and image quality. All of these attributes make the Dell 1200MP an Editors' Choice.

Don't miss our side-by-side projector comparison chart.

More projector reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Dell 1200MP

Dell 1200MP

4.0 Excellent

Small and lightweight, with a bright, high-quality image, the Dell 1200MP is a comfortable traveling companion and a great choice for presentations.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio