PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Apple Weighs In on Self-Driving Car Safety

Apple asked the feds to rethink safety certifications for self-driving car prototypes.

 & Tom Brant Managing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS

Self-driving car prototypes should not be subject to the same safety regulations as production vehicles, Apple argued in a letter last month to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Nextcar Bug artThe letter commends many other aspects of the agency's proposed Federal Automated Vehicles Policy (FAV), but it offers few clarifications to the rumors that have been swirling in recent months about Apple's own self-driving car ambitions.

From securing car-related domain names to hiring executives from Tesla, it's clear that Apple is at least exploring autonomous driving. But the company in September reportedly laid off dozens of employees working on the self-driving project, code-named Project Titan, in a sign that the tech giant is rethinking its efforts.

In the letter, sent by Apple Director of Product Integrity Steve Kenner on Nov. 22 and spotted by the Wall Street Journal last week, the company said it agreed with many safety and certification rules for the production of self-driving cars, but suggested that prototypes should not be subject to all of them. Rather than requesting exemptions from the rules each time it makes a modification to a prototype, Apple wants to self-certify that its prototypes are safe.

"Instead of applying for exemptions, all companies should be given an opportunity to implement internal safety processes summarized in a Safety Assessment," Kenner wrote. That's akin to the current process, which allows established manufacturers to test on public roads without pursuing exemptions from federal safety standards. But the proposed FAV policy has no such provision, a potential burden for Apple if it decides to test its own cars after the policy is enacted.

"To maximize the safety benefits of automated vehicles, encourage innovation, and promote fair
competition, established manufacturers and new entrants should be treated equally," Kenner wrote.

Main image courtesy of designer Meni Tsirbas (@MeniThings; YouTube)

About Our Expert

Tom Brant

Tom Brant

Managing Editor

I’m a managing editor at PCMag.com focused on PC hardware. Reading this during the day? Then you've caught me testing gear and editing reviews of Wi-Fi routers, printers, laptops, and tons of other personal tech. (Reading this at night? Then I’m probably dreaming about all those cool products.) I’ve covered the consumer tech world as an editor, reporter, and analyst since 2015.

I've covered most major consumer tech events, including CES, Computex, Google I/O, and IFA. I've also appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news.

Before I joined the tech-journalism ranks, I wrote on topics as diverse as Borneo's rainforests, Middle Eastern airlines, and Big Data's role in presidential elections. A graduate of Middlebury College, I also have a master's degree in journalism and French Studies from New York University.

The Technology I Use

While most people buy a phone or laptop and stick with it for years, I’m lucky enough to use devices based on Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows daily as part of my job. As a result, I cycle through lots of tech in addition to my IT-issue work laptop. (Yes, that's a ThinkPad.) Personally, I’ve also owned a lot of tech products both cutting-edge and cringeworthy, from the Nintendo GameCube and the original MacBook to the Palm m105 and the CueCat.

Read full bio