PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25

 & Jim Fisher Principal Writer, Cameras

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25 is a fast wide-angle optic that will reward shooters who are willing to focus manually. - Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25 is a fast wide-angle optic that will reward shooters who are willing to focus manually.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Fast aperture.
    • Incredibly sharp.
    • Negligible distortion.
    • Excellent build quality.
    • Expensive.
    • Manual focus only.
    • Heavy for its size.

Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25 Specs

Type Lens

The Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25 ($1,699 list) SEE IT is a fast lens with a wide 25mm field of view when used on a full-frame camera. It's a bit wider than Distagon T* 2/28, but manages to better it in sharpness, although it can't focus on objects quite as closely as the 28mm can. It is available for Nikon and Canon D-SLR cameras. It measures 3.9 by 2.9 inches (HD), but is heavy at 1.3 pounds due to its all-metal build. The manual focus ring is large and operates with a precise, smooth action. A metal hood is included, and standard 67mm filters are supported.

I used Imatest to see just how sharp the lens is when paired with the Nikon D600, and was impressed with the results. At f/2 it scores 2,638 lines per picture height, far beyond the 1,800 lines required for a sharp image. The socre increases as you stop down—it tops 3,000 lines by f/5.6. There is a small amount of barrel distortion, one percent, but no evidence of the rectilinear distortion that can cause the edges of wide-angle scenes to be stretched.


Because it is a manual focus lens, the overall sharpness of a photo will depend on your ability to nail focus. Nikon, Canon, and third-party manufacturers sell focusing screens for D-SLRs that are better suited for manual focus than the screens that are installed by default. If you find yourself reaching for manual focus glass on a regular basis, a screen with a split-image rangefinder and microprism collar, like the ones found on classic manual focus 35mm SLRs, would be a worthwhile investment. 

Shooting with the Distagon T* 2/25 is a dream. It's very smooth to focus, the images are incredibly sharp, and the wide aperture allows you to shoot in low light and to create a shallow depth of field when desired. If you're not opposed to focusing manually, and if you can afford the asking price, it's a solid wide-angle option. If manual focus isn't your thing, check out our Editors' Choice Nikon Nikkor AF-S 28mm f/1.8G—it's not quite as wide or sharp, but it does support autofocus.

More Digital Camera Reviews:
•   Canon EOS M50
•   Snapchat Spectacles 2
•   Phase One IQ3 100MP Trichromatic
•   Google Clips
•   Sony a7 III
•  more

Final Thoughts

The Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25 is a fast wide-angle optic that will reward shooters who are willing to focus manually. - Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25

Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25

4.0 Excellent

The Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2/25 is a fast wide-angle optic that will reward shooters who are willing to focus manually.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Jim Fisher

Jim Fisher

Principal Writer, Cameras

My Experience

Images, and the devices that capture them, are my focus. I've covered cameras at PCMag for the past 14 years, which has given me a front row seat for the changeover from DSLRs to mirrorless cameras, the smartphone camera revolution, and the emergence of drones for aerial imaging. I have extensive experience with every major mirrorless and SLR system, and am also comfortable using point-and-shoot and action cameras. As a Part 107 Certified drone pilot, I’m licensed to fly unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for commercial and editorial purposes, and am knowledgeable about federal rules and regulations regarding drones.

The Technology I Use

I use all of the major camera systems on a regular basis, swapping between Canon, Fujifilm, L-Mount, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon, and Sony systems. I still find time to use Leica M rangefinders and Pentax SLRs on occasion, too. I keep an iPhone 13 in my pocket for the rare occasions I'm not carrying a camera.

I'm not a brand-specific photographer. For product review photos, I swap between a Canon EOS R5 and a Sony a7R IV. I use Flashpoint and Godox TTL lights and Peak Design tripods, and I most often reach for a Think Tank or Peak Design backpack to carry equipment.

When it comes to computers, I'm an unapologetic Mac person and have been for the past 20 years. I write in Pages and use Numbers for spreadsheets. I currently swap between an Intel i9 MacBook Pro and an Apple Silicon Mac Studio for writing and use a calibrated BenQ 32.5-inch with the Studio for photo and video editing. I rely on a LaCie 6big RAID for media storage. I also keep a PC around for gaming, but please don't tell my Macs about it; they'll get jealous.

I split time between several different software apps depending on the type of editing I'm doing. For Raw image processing, Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic is my standard. I pair it with a LoupeDeck CT console to supplement my keyboard and trackpad, and I lean on RNI All Films 5 presets when I want to give an image a film look. I use Apple Final Cut Pro for video editing.

My first digital camera was the Canon PowerShot Elph S200, and my first DSLR was the Pentax *ist DL. I have a soft spot for antique film gear. I still use a 1950 vintage Rolleiflex Automat TLR and love trying mid-century Leica lenses on film and digital alike. I mainly use whatever's in front of me for review for digital snaps, but I pick up either my Leica M Typ 240 or Pentax K-3 III Monochrome when I want to step away from review work. In my downtime, I enjoy bird watching, reading, video games, and both good and bad movies, especially in the sci-fi and horror genres.

Read full bio