PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Canon Pixma iP1800

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Canon Pixma iP1800
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The Canon Pixma iP1800 is an impressive printer for the price, scoring surprisingly well on both speed and output quality.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Low price.
    • Small size.
    • Surprisingly fast.
    • Reasonably high-quality graphics and photos.
    • Text quality is subpar.
    • Requires manual alignment with every ink cartridge replacement.

Canon Pixma iP1800 Specs

Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 1 page, graph: 0:44 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 1 page, table A (with grid): 0:20 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Excel 2003 - 3 pages, charts and graphs: 1:48 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft PowerPoint 2003 - 4 full-page slides: 3:12 (min:sec)
Business Applications - DEFAULT SETTINGS - Microsoft Word 2003 - 2 pages, text: 0:30 (min:sec)
Claimed lifetime for photos - dark storage: 100 years
Claimed lifetime for photos - exposed: 10 years
Claimed lifetime for photos - framed behind glass: 30 years
Color or Monochrome: 1-pass color
Connection Type: USB
Cost Per Page (Color): 12 cents
Cost Per Page (Mono): 6 cents
Direct Printing from Cameras: No
Ink Jet Type: Photo All-Purpose
Input Capacity (printer input only): 100 sheets
LCD Preview Screen: No
Maximum Standard Paper Size: Legal
Network-Ready: No
Number of Cartridges: 2
Number of Ink Colors: 4
Photos - HIGH -QUALITY SETTINGS - Adobe Photoshop 7 - Average output time per print: 4" x 6" prints : 2:02 (min:sec)
Print Duplexing: No
Printer Category: Ink Jet
Tech Support: (800) 652-2666
Type: Printer Only

When you're looking at sub-$100 printers, it's reasonable to wonder how much you can expect for the price. When you get down to $50, the more appropriate question is whether the printer you're looking at is inexpensive or just plain cheap. With the Canon Pixma iP1800 ($49.99 direct), it's only the price that's cheap, making this printer a prime candidate for home or a college dorm, and even a potential choice for light-duty printing in a home office.

At 6 by 17.4 by 9.3 inches (HWD), the iP1800 is small enough to fit just about anyplace you might need it. Setup is typical for an ink jet: Plug it in, turn it on, and snap in the black and tricolor cartridges. Then run the automated installation program and plug in a USB cable when the program tells you to. Unlike most Canon printers, the iP1800 includes the nozzles in the cartridges, so there's no separate print head to install.

Unfortunately, one choice Canon made to keep the price low was to eliminate automatic alignment. That means you have to align the print heads manually—an unusual step for all but the least-expensive printers today. Manual alignment involves printing an alignment page, picking the best-looking choices for each of several alignment samples, and then entering the settings in the printer driver. Given the price, relying on manual alignment is acceptable, but it doesn't make the process any less of a chore, especially since you have to do it whenever you replace a cartridge. Consider it the price you have to pay for the benefit of shelling out less cash.

One thing you don't have to compromise on with the iP1800 is performance. I timed it on our business applications suite at a respectable 21 minutes 15 seconds total (using QualityLogic's hardware and software for timing, www.qualitylogic.com). That's comparable to speeds for all-in-ones that cost $100 or more, including, for example, the Dell Photo All-In-One 926 Printer at 20:49. As another point of reference, the Lexmark Z1300 printer, which costs even less than the iP1800 ($25 street), took 35:03. Photos averaged a more-than-acceptable 2:02 for 4-by-6s and 4:04 for 8-by-10s.

The iP1800 also scores reasonably well on quality. Text is a little below par for an ink jet, but far from the worst I've seen. The only real problems were with two heavily stylized fonts with thick strokes. One font needed 20 points to qualify as easily readable. The other font couldn't pass that threshold even at 20 points. Even so, all the standard fonts in our tests—the ones you might use in business or school work—were easily readable, with well-formed characters, at 8 points, and in some cases even at 6 points. Edges aren't as sharp as I'd want if I were trying to project a sense of professionalism, but the quality is good enough for most business needs, and certainly good enough for school.

Graphics and photo quality match most of what you find in other ink jets. With graphics I saw some banding in default mode, but not in high-quality mode, and a tendency (as with many printers), for thin lines to disappear. Like other Canon printers, full-page graphics printed with the iP1800 tended to curl the plain paper we used on our tests.

None of these count as serious issues, however. The graphics are easily good enough for schoolwork and internal business use. If you stay away from thin lines, print in high-quality mode, and invest in a slightly more expensive, heavier-weight paper to avoid curling, the graphics are even good enough for output aimed at a client or customer you want to impress with your professionalism.

Photo quality is typical for a current-model ink jet, making the 1P1800's prints as good as photos from your local drugstore or photo shop. That's a bit short of what you can get from the best photo printers or a professional photo lab, but it's also true photo quality by definition. I saw a slight blue shift in some photos, and hints of color in some shades of gray on a monochrome photo, but no serious issues. Unless you have a critical eye, you probably won't notice any problems.

The photos are also reasonably water resistant. If you let drops of water dry, they'll leave water stains, but you can hand the photos around for people to look at without worrying about them coming back smudged. I held one under running water and rubbed it without noticeable effect.

Unfortunately the photos aren't scratchproof, which means you'll need to be careful about sliding them over each other. I saw lots of surface scratches after repeatedly shuffling through the stack. If you can avoid scratching them, however, they should last a long time. Canon claims they will resist fading for 100 years if kept in dark storage, as in an album; 30 years if kept behind glass; and 10 years if exposed to the air.

Overall, the Canon Pixma iP1800 is a surprisingly good printer. I'd like it even more if its text quality were a bit better. Still, the text is good enough for most personal and business needs, the graphics and photos are more than adequate, and the performance is terrific for the price. It all adds up to making the iP1800 a great choice if you need a printer for a home, home office, or dorm room.

Check out the Canon Pixma iP1800's test scores.

More Ink-Jet Printer Reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Canon Pixma iP1800

Canon Pixma iP1800

3.5 Good

The Canon Pixma iP1800 is an impressive printer for the price, scoring surprisingly well on both speed and output quality.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio