PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Boxlight Bumblebee

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Boxlight Bumblebee
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

The Boxlight BumbleBee is small, portable, and an equally good fit for business presentations to small groups or for watching movies and playing games at home.

Pros & Cons

    • Highly portable.
    • SVGA (800-by-600) resolution.
    • Includes remote and battery.
    • Volume is too low to be useful.

Boxlight Bumblebee Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Native Resolution 800 x 600
Rated Brightness 150
Warranty 24
Weight 1.1

Whoever named the Boxlight BumbleBee ($799 list) should have remembered Muhammad Ali's famous description of his fighting style—float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. The Boxlight entry is much more butterfly than bee—quiet in operation, light in weight, and pretty to look at. Add it to the short but growing list of projectors that pair a DLP chip with an LED light source to shrink the machine down to a small size that was unprecedented until recently.

The BumbleBee shares most of its basics with the rest of this crop of LED projectors, which includes the Mitsubishi PK20 PocketProjector, the Samsung Pocket Imager SP-P310MEMX, and the Editors' Choice Toshiba TDP-FF1AU Mobile Projector. It offers SVGA (800-by-600) native resolution, and it's designed for uses such as giving business presentations to small groups or for setting up at a moment's notice at home to watch movies, show photos, or play games.

All of these projectors are small and lightweight. The BumbleBee is just 1.1 pounds, and measures 1.9 by 4.8 by 3.9 inches (HWD). The power block (which is about a third as large as the projector) and cord add just under a pound. So does the included battery, which is good for 2 hours on a full charge, according to Boxlight.

Setup is easy. The BumbleBee offers an HD-15 connector (which serves as both a VGA port and component-video port), S-Video and composite-video ports, stereo minijacks for both audio input and output, and an SD card slot to let you show photos or presentations stored on an SD card. (The projector can read JPG, AVI, and MPG files from a card.) To set it up, you simply plug in the AC adapter and cables (or SD card), turn the projector on, point it at a wall or screen, and manually focus the image.

One minor issue you may run into is that the right-angle power plug tends to cover either the audio ports or the VGA port, so you may have to twist and turn cables to get everything plugged in. More important, as with other LED projectors with built-in audio, the volume is far too low to be useful. If you want to watch movies, be sure you have an external audio system handy to plug into the audio output.

As I've pointed out in other LED projector reviews, the current crop of LED projectors all have lower ANSI lumen ratings than standard projectors. Samsung, for example, rates the SP-P310MEMX at 50 ANSI lumens, Mitsubishi rates the PK20 at 25 lumens, and Toshiba doesn't even give a rating for its projector. Fortunately, perception of brightness is nonlinear. Double the brightness in lumens, and you'll hardly notice the difference. Even the difference between 25 lumens and 1,000 lumens is less apparent than you might expect.

Case in point: The Samsung, Mitsubishi, and Toshiba results in my tests ranged between 16 and 39 lumens, but all three are closely matched for actual use. In a bright room with sunlight streaming through the windows, any of them can throw a usable image of up to about 15 inches. At night, with typical ambient lighting, the usable size goes up to about 40 inches. Dim the lights, and you can move up to a still larger size.

Boxlight claims that the BumbleBee is brighter than its competition, at 150 ANSI lumens. On my tests, however, I measured it at just 23 lumens in its bright mode, putting it in the same category as the other LED projectors. (I didn't run our usual contrast-ratio measurements on any of these projectors, because they aren't bright enough to measure contrast ratio reliably.)

Most DLP projectors suffer from a rainbow effect, with white areas breaking up into red, green, and blue when you shift your gaze or when the white objects move on screen. The effect is more obvious in all the LED projectors I've reviewed than with standard DLP projectors, but the BumbleBee earns points for having the least obvious rainbow effect of any of the LED projectors. Even so, if you're sensitive to this effect, you can expect to see it with the BumbleBee.

More troublesome is that in a dark enough room, two lines of small dots appear—one above the projected image and one below—that are presumably caused by internal reflection in the optical path. Boxlight confirmed that it could replicate the dots with another unit. Fortunately, they're faint enough that they're washed away by even a little ambient light. Image quality for both computer and video signals was otherwise more than acceptable.

The Boxlight BumbleBee has the small size and portability characteristic of these LED projectors. But even with the included battery helping to make it a better value than some of its competitors, I'd shy away from it if you think you might ever want to use it in a fully darkened room.

Benchmark Test Results
Check out the Boxlight Bumblebee's test scores.

More Projector reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Boxlight Bumblebee

Boxlight Bumblebee

3.0 Average

The Boxlight BumbleBee is small, portable, and an equally good fit for business presentations to small groups or for watching movies and playing games at home.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio