PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Boxlight Boston X28NST

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
The Boxlight Boston X28NST projector delivers a high-quality data image at a native XGA resolution. - Boxlight Boston X28NST
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The Boxlight Boston X28NST projector offers a high-quality data image paired with a short-throw lens to give you a big image from close to the screen.

Pros & Cons

    • Short throw.
    • High-quality data image.
    • Long lamp life.
    • LCD-based, which guarantees it can't show rainbow artifacts.
    • No 3D support.
    • Low volume with built-in speaker.
    • As with most data projectors, video quality is unimpressive.

Boxlight Boston X28NST Specs

Engine Type LCD
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Inputs and Interfaces USB
Native Resolution 1024 by 768
Rated Brightness 2800
Warranty 36
Weight 9

If you need an XGA (1,024-by-768) projector that can throw a large image in a tight space, the LCD-based Boxlight Boston X28NST is of obvious interest. In addition to the short-throw lens, which lets it project big images from close to the screen, it delivers a high-quality data image, watchable video (which is more than some data projectors can manage), and the promise of a long lamp life. The combination makes it a strong contender as a short-throw XGA projector for a small to mid-size conference room or classroom.

Short-throw projectors like the X28NST or the Editors' Choice NEC Display Solutions NP-M300WS are more expensive than equivalent models with a standard throw, because their lenses cost more. What justifies the price is the short throw. With the X28NST in particular, I measured a 78-inch wide (98-inch diagonal) image with the projector just 48 inches from the screen. That's less than half the distance a projector with a standard-throw lens would need.

There's little reason to spend extra money for a short-throw projector unless you actually need the short throw. But if you're looking to project a large image in a small room, or have a potential issue with shadows from anything that might get between a standard-throw projector and the screen, a short-throw projector can easily be worth the extra cost.

Basics and Setup

With its nine-pound weight, the X28NST is just heavy enough to make it most appropriate for permanent installation or mounting on a cart for moving it from room to room.

Setup is standard for a short-throw projector, with a manual focus and no zoom. Image inputs on the back panel include the usual VGA, HDMI, and composite video ports as well as an S-Video port, a USB A port for reading files directly from a USB memory key, and a mini-USB B port for direct USB display.

In addition, the projector offers a 1.5GB internal memory to let you show images without needing an external image source, and there's a LAN port you can use both to control the projector and to send images and audio over a network. Finally, Boxlight also sells an optional Wi-Fi dongle ($99 list) that will let you send images from PCs, Macs, and iOS and Android phones and tablets. In each case, there are apps available for the most recent versions of OSs.

Brightness and Image Quality

The X28NST's 2,800-lumen brightness rating is a touch lower than the more typical 3,000 lumens or so for recent models aimed at small to medium-size conference rooms and classrooms. However, that's not a big difference. As a point of reference, using SMPTE (Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers) recommendations, 3,000 lumens is bright enough in theater-dark lighting with a 1.0 gain screen for a 202- to 273-inch image measured diagonally. At 2,800 lumens, the recommended size drops to an overlapping 195 to 264 inches.

Because the X28NST is an LCD-based projector, it has the same color brightness as white brightness, which isn't necessarily true for DLP projectors. That means it maintains brightness for color images better than projectors with a lower color brightness than white brightness. (For more on color brightness, see Color Brightness: What It Is, and Why You Should Care.)

Data image quality is a strong point, with the X28NST scoring well on our standard suite of DisplayMate tests. Colors were fully saturated and vibrant in all modes and color balance was good, with acceptably neutral grays at all levels from black to white.

More important for most data images is that the image maintained fine detail across the entire screen, with both black text on white and white text on black crisp and highly readable at sizes as small at 6.8 points. The screen was also rock solid with an analog (VGA) connection, even with images that tend to cause pixel jitter or dynamic moire patterns. I didn't see any noticeably improvement when I switched to a digital (HDMI) connection.

As expected for a data projector, the X28NST didn't do as well with video as with data images. It handled shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas) better than most data projectors, but I saw some posterization (shading changing suddenly where it should change gradually) and moderately obvious noise in solid areas, like an expanse of sky or a blank wall. Colors also had a washed out look that indicates a low contrast ratio.

That said, the video was good enough to watch a full-length movie comfortably, which makes the X28NST better for watching video than many data projectors. It also helps that as an LCD projector, it's guaranteed not to show the rainbow artifacts—in the form of flashes of red, green, and blue—that DLP projectors often show. On the other hand, because it's an LCD projector, it doesn't offer 3D support, which is all but standard in DLP projectors today.

Other Issues

One other plus that demands mention is the projector's long lamp life, with a rated 4,000 hours in Normal mode or 6,000 hours in Eco mode. Also note that Boxlight offers a Lamps for Life option ($299) that provides replacement lamps for the life of the projector. The only additional cost is for shipping, including for sending the old lamp back to Boxlight. Alternatively, you can buy replacement lamps as needed ($349 list).

A final minor issue is that despite a 10-watt mono speaker the audio system is barely loud enough to fill a small conference room. If you need higher volume or stereo, plan on plugging an external sound system into the projector's stereo audio output.

There's no reason to spend extra on a short throw projector unless you really need the short throw. If you need it, however, the Boxlight Boston X28NST offers a lot to like, including the excellent data image quality, acceptable video quality, and a long lamp life. If XGA is the resolution you need for a small to mid-size conference room or classroom, the Boxlight Boston X28NST can be a great fit.

Final Thoughts

The Boxlight Boston X28NST projector delivers a high-quality data image at a native XGA resolution. - Boxlight Boston X28NST

Boxlight Boston X28NST

4.0 Excellent

The Boxlight Boston X28NST projector offers a high-quality data image paired with a short-throw lens to give you a big image from close to the screen.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio