PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Bose Computer MusicMonitor

 & Tim Gideon Contributing Editor, Audio

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
 - Bose Computer MusicMonitor
3.0 Average

The Bottom Line

The Computer MusicMonitor has a pleasant, crisp delivery but lacks bass presence and costs a whopping $400. Bose should at least add some extra features to the remote to justify the high price.

Buy It Now

Pros & Cons

    • Clarity in mid and high frequencies.
    • Upwardly angled for desktop listening.
    • Sleek and compact design.
    • Powerful output.
    • Overpriced.
    • Very little low-end presence.
    • Remote is limited.

Bose Computer MusicMonitor Specs

Channels: 2
Type: Computer

Bose is better known to the general public for its QuietComfort headphones. Now, in its Computer MusicMonitor, the company has some very small, very expensive computer speakers. A Bose representative told me that the concept behind the Computer MusicMonitor was to create the "highest audio accuracy" possible while being "as unobtrusive as possible." Bose wanted a simple, good-sounding speaker set for computers in rooms that are more visible than home offices and have less space for subwoofers (for instance, a kitchen). The speakers do deliver nice clarity in the mid and high frequency range, but the "opposing passive radiator" technology meant to deliver deep lows doesn't quite do the trick. These are high-quality compact speakers, but $400 should get you a better remote and deeper bass.

The Computer MusicMonitor has no subwoofer, has no software to install, and comes with a very bare-bones remote control. Setup takes about 2 seconds. The speakers are less than 5 inches tall and only 2.5 inches wide, and they're angled upward—a simple, smart touch that many PC speaker manufacturers forget is essential for desktop listening. The included remote is a bit of a disappointment—it has only volume up/down and power buttons. I can understand Bose's desire to keep this system simple and not involve software that could control iTunes and Windows Media Player as the Logitech Z Cinéma does, but the surface area of this poor remote is terribly underutilized. How about bass and treble controls, or, at the very least, a mute button? A set of controls identical to the three on the remote sits on the inside panel of the right speaker.

The overall modern, minimalist aluminum design would complement a MacBook Pro perfectly, and this no doubt accounts for some of the price. Bose offers a one-year limited warranty, and product support can be found on the company site.

To be fair, the Computer MusicMonitor certainly delivers a nice level of clarity in the mid and high frequencies, and at high volumes users will notice a powerful output that rarely, if ever, distorts. This is due to the internal use of a dynamics limiter—which means, essentially, that when volume surpasses a certain threshold (determined by several factors, including speaker level and overall loudness of the particular track), the dynamic range is squashed a bit to prevent distortion. Purists won't love this, as it definitely messes with the mix, but folks who will happily sacrifice "pure" sound for not blowing their speakers out or hearing an annoying buzz at high volumes will appreciate this feature.

My main problem with the MusicMonitor is its lack of low-end depth. That's despite the fact that Bose promises increased bass with its "opposing passive radiator" technology. The front face of the each speaker has a driver that covers the full frequency range behind a metallic grill; the rear portion features two slit ports that push out the air from the two opposing radiators per speaker. Bose found that one radiator produced decent bass, but the vibrations were too intense. Providing an opposing radiator, however, creates inverse vibrations simultaneously, thus canceling out the total vibration of the speaker. The end result is that your speakers don't dance across your desktop, and a bit more bass is created.

Is there more bass presence, in these speakers than in most speakers of this size? Sure, but not by much, and honestly, there simply aren't very many speakers this size that sound good. JBL's Spyros, for example, are tiny, but they have a subwoofer. The whole point here was to achieve substantial bass with no sub. Did it work? I'd say that if the speakers were below $200, I'd be pretty impressed, but I still don't think these speakers' output is of a high enough quality to warrant $400. If you could find space for a subwoofer, for instance, the Harman/Kardon SoundSticks II, now almost four years old, sound amazing, take up about the same amount of desk surface area (they're tall and narrow), and cost about $200. With the money you save, you could buy an iPod nano (or a plant to hide your subwoofer).

Compared with another sub-less set on the market, the Audioengine 2, the Bose fares favorably. The Audioengine speakers are much larger—about 6 inches tall and 4 inches wide—and, since they have dedicated woofers, they deliver more low end, but the overall sound is a bit muddier. The Audioengine 2, however, is still a decent pair of good-looking speakers, and it retails for $200.

Clearly, my main issue here is price. For a pair of speakers to break the $350 barrier, they had better have excellent clarity, substantial low end, excellent design, and a terrific remote. Two out of four ain't bad, but the lack of bass and a versatile remote would leave me with a nasty case of buyer's remorse if I purchased the MusicMonitors at full price.

More Speaker Reviews:

Final Thoughts

 - Bose Computer MusicMonitor

Bose Computer MusicMonitor

3.0 Average

The Computer MusicMonitor has a pleasant, crisp delivery but lacks bass presence and costs a whopping $400. Bose should at least add some extra features to the remote to justify the high price.

Get It Now

Buy It Now

About Our Expert

Tim Gideon

Tim Gideon

Contributing Editor, Audio

My Experience

I've been a contributing editor for PCMag since 2011. Before that, I was PCMag's lead audio analyst from 2006 to 2011. Even though I'm a freelancer now, PCMag has been my home for well over a decade, and audio gear reviews are still my primary focus. Prior to my career in reviewing tech, I worked as an audio engineer—my love of recording audio eventually led me to writing about audio gear.

My Areas of Expertise

  • Headphones and earphones
  • Wireless and computer speakers
  • USB mics
  • Bluetooth headsets

The Technology I Use

Probably because of their prevalence in the recording studios I worked in a long time ago, I am most comfortable on Macs—I'm writing this on the 2019 iMac I use for testing. I also have a MacBook Pro that gets plenty of similar use.

My workspace has a mini recording studio setup, and the the gear I work with there is a mix of items I've used forever (Paradigm Mini Monitors and a McIntosh stereo receiver) and newer gear I use for recording and review testing (such as the Universal Audio Apollo x16).

I'm obsessed with modern boutique analog synths—some of my favorites instruments in this realm are the Landscape Audio Stereo Field and HC-TT,  the Soma Enner, the Koma Field Kit, and the Lorre Mill Keyed Mosstone.

From my studio days, I'm comfortable using Pro Tools, and in recent years have branched out to other realms of creative software, like Adobe Premiere and After Effects.

I stream music, but I also still buy albums, digitally or on vinyl, and encourage anyone who wants fair compensation for musicians and engineers to do the same.

I also play lots of Wordle.

Read full bio