PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

BenQ MX766

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
BenQ MX766 - BenQ MX766
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

The BenQ MX766 projector delivers more than acceptable data image quality, with a bright enough image to stand up to ambient light in a mid- to large-size conference room.
Best Deal£2384.52

Buy It Now

£2384.52

Pros & Cons

    • Bright, with a 4,000-lumen rating, and reasonably portable.
    • 1.5x zoom lens.
    • Scores well for data image quality.
    • Rainbow artifacts limit usefulness for video.
    • Sound suitable for only a small room or a little larger.

BenQ MX766 Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 1024 by 768
Rated Brightness 4000
Warranty 36
Weight 8.6

With its 4,000-lumen rating, the DLP-based BenQ MX766 ($2,199 list) is obviously designed to throw an image that's big enough for a mid- to large-size conference room or classroom and bright enough to stand up to ambient light. It also delivers reasonably high quality for data images. The combination is enough to make it a reasonable candidate if you need an XGA (1,024 by 768) projector.

A head-to-head competitor with the Editors' Choice Epson PowerLite 1880 MultiMedia Projector, which shares the same brightness rating and resolution, the MX766 is a little heavier but still in the same weight class, at 8 pounds 10 ounces.

The rule of thumb for projectors in this 7 to 9 pound range is that they're most likely to wind up either permanently installed or mounted on a cart for room-to-room portability. However they're also light enough to carry with you. With that in mind, BenQ even ships the MX766 with a soft carrying case. If you need an unusually bright portable projector, or need to store the projector when you're not using it, that counts as a small but welcome extra that Epson doesn't provide for the 1880.

Connections, Setup, and Brightness

Setting up the MX766 is standard fare, with a manual focus and manual 1.5x zoom. The back panel offers a reasonably full set of image inputs, including the usual HDMI, VGA, and composite video ports. Other choices include S-Video, a USB mini B for USB display, two USB A ports—one for reading files directly from a USB key and one for adding an optional Wi-Fi dongle ($49 list), and a LAN port both for sending images and audio over a network and for controlling the projector.

As a point of reference, following SMPTE (Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers) recommendations, 4,000 lumens would be appropriate for roughly a 270-inch diagonal image at the projector's native aspect ratio, assuming a 1.0 gain screen and theater-dark lighting. In my tests, the 98-inch diagonal (78-inch wide) image I used was easily bright enough to stand up to the ambient light in a typical conference room or classroom.

Data and Video Image Quality

The MX766 scored reasonably well for data quality. On our standard suite of DisplayMate tests, color balance was excellent in all preset modes, with suitably neutral grays at all levels from black to white. Colors were nicely saturated in all modes as well, although red and blue were a little dark in the brightest mode and yellow was a little mustard-colored in some modes.

More important for most data images is that the projector handled detail well. With text, for example, both black on white and white on black characters were crisp and fully readable at sizes as small as 6.8 points. With an analog (Read: VGA) connection, I saw some minor to moderate dynamic moiré on screens that are designed to bring out that issue. However, unless you use patterned fills in your images, you'll probably never see this problem. If you do see it, and it bothers you, note that it disappeared entirely when I switched to a digital (meaning HDMI) connection.

The XGA resolution necessarily puts some limits on video quality, particularly for showing widescreen video, which has to scale the image to fit in the pixels available on the chip. Within the limits of the resolution, however, the projector does well in most ways, although I saw some mild to moderate loss of shadow detail (details based on shading in dark areas) and some minimal noise on screen.

The real problem for video is rainbow artifacts, with light areas breaking up into red-green-blue flashes of light. These are always a potential problem for any single-chip DLP projector. With the MX766, as with most DLP models, the artifacts show rarely enough with data screens that it's unlikely that anyone will find them objectionable. With video they show far more often.

The good news is that the artifacts show less often than with most DLP projectors. So even though people who see the artifacts easily would likely find them annoying for long sessions, it's unlikely that they'll be an issue for clips of up to a few minutes. That doesn't put the MX766 in the same class for video as the LCD-based PowerLite 1880, which can't show rainbow artifacts at all. However, it's more than you can safely assume for most DLP data projectors, and it counts as minor plus.

The sound system also counts as more of a plus than a minus, despite some shortcomings. The volume isn't as high as you might expect from the 20-watt speaker, but it's enough to fill a small- to not-quite-mid-size room, and the quality is good. In one test clip, I could make out every word of softly spoken dialog that gets lost with most projectors. If you need more volume, better quality, or stereo, you can plug an external sound system into the projector's audio output.

If you need a bright projector for portable use, keep in mind that 4000 lumens may be overkill. You might be better off with, say, the 3000-lumen NEC Display Solutions NP-V300X ($779 direct, 3.5 stars). Similarly, if you need to show a lot of video, you'll probably want an LCD-projector like the Epson PowerLite 1880. That said, if you need an XGA projector, and you don't need to show long video clips, the MX766 is a perfectly reasonable choice.

Best Projector Picks

Further Reading

Final Thoughts

BenQ MX766 - BenQ MX766

BenQ MX766 Review

3.5 Good

The BenQ MX766 projector delivers more than acceptable data image quality, with a bright enough image to stand up to ambient light in a mid- to large-size conference room.

Get It Now
Best Deal£2384.52

Buy It Now

£2384.52

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio