PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

avast! Free Antivirus 8

 & Neil J. Rubenking Principal Writer, Security

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
Avast Free Antivirus 2016 scores high in independent lab tests and in our own tests, especially our antiphishing test. Bonus features like the new password manager and innovative router security scan make it an excellent choice for free antivirus protection. - avast! Free Antivirus 8
3.5 Good

The Bottom Line

Besides antivirus protection, avast! Free Antivirus 8 offers patch management, Web reputation, and more. However, its test scores are merely good, not great.

Pros & Cons

    • Boot-time scan cleans malware before Windows boots.
    • Very good at blocking malicious URLs and downloads.
    • Finds and fixes unpatched vulnerabilities.
    • Automatically sandboxes suspicious programs.
    • Can remove unwanted browser toolbars.
    • Built-in remote assistance.
    • Installation on infested systems required hours of support.
    • Boot-time scan may require user interaction.
    • So-so phishing protection.
    • Test results decent, but not great.

avast! Free Antivirus 8 Specs

Free: Yes
OS Compatibility: Windows 7
OS Compatibility: Windows Vista
OS Compatibility: Windows XP
Tech Support: and free phone support for US.
Tech Support: Forum
Tech Support: social sites
Tech Support: support web site
Type: Personal

Being a world-spanning purveyor of free antivirus protection involves walking a fine line. Giving away your core technology gets you plenty of gratitude, but gratitude doesn't pay the bills. The clever people at Avast Software seem to have mastered the balance. Avast Free Antivirus 2016 (reviewed here) is full-featured and powerful, and yet there are still plenty of additional goodies to entice you to upgrade to Avast Pro Antivirus£31.99 at AVAST.

Avast has retained more or less the same appearance for quite some time, but the 2016 edition got a complete makeover. The wide-open main window features a bit of abstract art, with a security status report in the middle. A menu of icons across the top lets you select Scan, Tools, Passwords, or Store. Like the icons used by Trend Micro Antivirus+ Security 2016£24.95 at Trend Micro UK, these icons animate when you mouse over them.

Installation is simple enough. Note that unless you opt out, the installer will install Google Chrome and add the Google Toolbar to your system. Perhaps in reaction to the recent kerfuffle regarding AVG's privacy policy, the installer includes a screen of information about how Avast handles your information, with a link to the full privacy policy online and instructions on how to opt out of participation. Another screen offers a link to protect your Android device with Avast Mobile Security & Antivirus.

Good Lab Results
All of the labs I follow scrutinize Avast's technology, even ICSA Labs and West Coast Labs, both of which certify Avast for virus detection. Virus Bulletin included Avast in 11 of the latest 12 rounds of testing and awarded it VB100 certification in nine of those tests. AVG AntiVirus Free (2016)See it at AVG participated in all 12 tests and earned VB100 in 11 of those.

In the three-part protection, performance, and usability test by AV-Test Institute, Avast earned 5.5 of 6 possible points for protection and got 16 points (of a possible 18) overall. AVG and Panda Free Antivirus (2016)SEE IT took the full 6 points for protection.

Avast Free Antivirus 2016 Lab Tests Chart

In four different tests by AV-Comparatives, Avast would have earned the best rating, Advanced+. However, false positives (valid files detected as malware) knocked one test's score down to merely Advanced. Panda flips those scores, with three Advanced and one Advanced+. Kaspersky Anti-Virus (2016)£19.99 at Kaspersky UK and Bitdefender participate in five of this lab's tests, and both managed Advanced+ in all of them.

The elaborate website-playback system used by Dennis Technology Labs for testing requires a lot of work, so this lab doesn't test as many products—ten or fewer, where AV-Test and AV-Comparatives test 20 or more. Products earn points for thorough malware blocking and lose points for any they miss; negative scores are possible. In the end, the lab offers certification at five levels: AAA, AA, A, B, and C. Both Avast and AVG earned AA certification.

Avast's lab scores are quite good for a free product. If you want an antivirus that gets the very best scores across the board, though, you'll have to spring for a paid product like Kaspersky or Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2016£19.99 at Bitdefender UK.

Related Story

See How We Interpret Antivirus Lab Tests

Effective Malware Blocking

For the vast majority of antivirus products, my malware-blocking test starts the moment I open my folder full of samples. The tiny access that occurs when Windows Explorer displays file details is enough to trigger a scan. Avast is one of the few that only initiate a scan just before an unknown file executes.

Having seen Avast in action, I can report that the just-before-launch scan seems effective. In a few cases, it held off the program's launch for about 15 seconds pending analysis by Avast's DeepScan technology. It performed the same kind of analysis on some of my hand-written testing tools before green lighting them.

Avast Free Antivirus 2016 Main Window

Final Thoughts

Avast Free Antivirus 2016 scores high in independent lab tests and in our own tests, especially our antiphishing test. Bonus features like the new password manager and innovative router security scan make it an excellent choice for free antivirus protection. - avast! Free Antivirus 8

avast! Free Antivirus 8

3.5 Good

Besides antivirus protection, avast! Free Antivirus 8 offers patch management, Web reputation, and more. However, its test scores are merely good, not great.

About Our Expert

Neil J. Rubenking

Neil J. Rubenking

Principal Writer, Security

My Experience

When the IBM PC was new, I served as the president of the San Francisco PC User Group for three years. That’s how I met PCMag’s editorial team, who brought me on board in 1986. In the years since that fateful meeting, I’ve become PCMag’s expert on security, privacy, and identity protection, putting antivirus tools, security suites, and all kinds of security software through their paces.

Before my current security gig, I supplied PCMag readers with tips and solutions on using popular applications, operating systems, and programming languages in my "User to User" and "Ask Neil" columns, which began in 1990 and ran for almost 20 years. Along the way, I wrote more than 40 utility articles, as well as Delphi Programming for Dummies and six other books covering DOS, Windows, and programming. I also reviewed thousands of products of all kinds, ranging from early Sierra Online adventure games to AOL’s precursor Q-Link.

In the early 2000s, I turned my focus to security and the growing antivirus industry. After years of working with antivirus, I’m known throughout the security industry as an expert on evaluating antivirus tools. I serve as an advisory board member for the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization (AMTSO), an international nonprofit group dedicated to coordinating and improving testing of anti-malware solutions.

The Technology I Use

Much of the testing I do, particularly testing with real-world ransomware, is just plain dangerous. To perform such tests safely, I sequester them inside virtual machines managed by VMWare Workstation. For cross-platform testing, I use a MacBook Air, a Google Pixel 4, and a 6th-generation iPad.

I rely on my Delphi coding skills to create and maintain small applications. These include programs to check whether an antivirus correctly handled the malware it detected, launch dangerous URLs and record the security program’s reaction, and analyze the malware that I collect for use in testing. I also wrote a tiny browser and text editor for use in testing security apps that have predefined reactions for known products.

I do my writing and research on a Dell OptiPlex desktop, relying on Microsoft Word (my fingers know all the shortcuts). Many of my articles include charts and analysis; Excel is my go-to for those. When work hours end, though, I escape the bounds of Microsoft and Windows. There’s an iPhone in my pocket, I relax with my oversized iPad, and my Kindle Oasis is always loaded with the best science fiction and fantasy.

Read full bio