PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

AAXA P4-X Pico Projector

 & M. David Stone Contributing Editor

Our team tests, rates, and reviews more than 1,500 products each year to help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology.

Our Expert
LOOK INSIDE PC LABS HOW WE TEST
65 EXPERTS
43 YEARS
41,500+ REVIEWS
AAXA P4-X Pico Projector - AAXA P4-X Pico Projector
4.0 Excellent

The Bottom Line

The AAXA P4-X Pico Projector is bright for its size, at a claimed 80 lumens using AC power or 50 lumens with batteries, and delivers surprisingly good image quality.

Pros & Cons

    • Bright for the price.
    • Mini HDMI port.
    • Reads files directly from microSD cards and USB memory keys.
    • Low volume.
    • Loud fan noise.

AAXA P4-X Pico Projector Specs

Engine Type DLP
Inputs and Interfaces Analog VGA
Inputs and Interfaces HDMI
Native Resolution 854 x 480
Rated Brightness 80
Warranty 12
Weight 10

Despite the name, the AAXA P4-X Pico Projector ($300 street) is a bit too large to qualify as pico size by our definition. At 1.2 by 5.5 by 2.8 inches (HWD) it just misses being able to fit in a shirt pocket. Whatever you choose to call it, however (I'd call it a palmtop), it's both highly portable and highly capable, with a bright image, good image quality, lots of connection options, and the ability to read files from memory, a combination that makes it Editors' Choice.

Built around a DLP chip paired with an LED light source, the P4-X  offers a native widescreen resolution at 854 by 640, one of the variations on WVGA. Like the slightly smaller Editors' Choice Optoma PK301 Pico Pocket Projector ($400 street, 4 stars), it offers two brightness ratings, but note that the P4-X's lower rating matches the PK-301's higher rating. AAXA rates the projector at 80 lumens using AC power or 50 lumens with its rechargeable battery (which AAXA says is good for 75 minutes on a full charge).

You'll want to take advantage of the higher brightness whenever you can, which means that in addition to the 10-ounce P4-X itself, you'll generally need to carry the power block as well, for a total weight of 15 ounces. The good news is that you may not have to carry an image source also. Like many pico and palmtop projectors, the P4-X enhances its portability by letting you read files directly from memory, which in this case means USB memory keys or microSD cards. (There is no internal memory.)

Setup

Setting up the P4-X consists of little more than turning it on, pointing it at whatever you're using for a screen, focusing the image, and then using the built-in menus to pick the right image source. To read files from memory, you can either plug a card into the microSD card slot or take advantage of the mini USB connector and supplied adaptor that lets you plug a USB key into the other end. Note that the only file formats the documentation says the projector can read are AVI, MPG, MP4, and MP3, but in my tests it read JPG and TXT files without problems, and AAXA says it reads GIF and BMP as well.

If you want to use an external image source, your connection choices include a mini-HDMI port for a computer or video source, which is a particularly nice touch. A proprietary connector also lets you connect to a computer VGA port using a supplied cable, and an AV port paired with an adapter adds connectors for composite video and stereo audio. AAXA also sells additional adaptors (at $12.99 to $19.99 direct each) for iPod, Zune, and PSP connections. The only other connector is a stereo audio output for a headset or speakers.

loading...

Brightness and Image Quality

With palmtop projectors like the Editors' Choice 3M Mobile Projector MP410 ($599 direct, 4 stars) offering 300 lumens, the P4-X's 80 lumens may not sound like a lot. But keep in mind that perception of brightness is logarithmic, so although 300 lumens is 3.75 times 80 lumens, it won't make the image look anywhere near 3.75 times as bright. That makes the lower brightness a more than fair trade-off for the P4-X's much lower price.

I tested the P4-X primarily with AC power. Based on The Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) recommendation for image brightness, an 80-lumen image in theater dark lighting should allow comfortable viewing at screen sizes ranging from 35- to 47-inches diagonally. This closely matches the 48-inch maximum diagonal image size I settled on before I did the calculation.

Quite apart from issues of brightness, the P4-X did a good job on data image quality. On our standard suite of DisplayMate tests, it delivered fully saturated, eye-catching color; good color balance with suitably neutral grays over the entire range from white to black; and reasonably crisp, readable text at sizes as small as 9 points.

Video quality was also surprisingly good. I saw some slight posterization (colors changing suddenly where they should change gradually), and a moderate to major problem with shadow detail (the loss of detail in dark areas), but both showed only in scenes that tend to create problems for most data projectors. Neither showed up in any significant way in more carefully lit scenes, which is what you'll usually get with commercial source material. Skin tones were a little oversaturated in some cases, but video quality was generally good enough to be usable.

Rainbows and Other Issues

Rainbow artifacts, with bright areas breaking up into little red-green-blue rainbows, are always a concern for any single-chip DLP projector. That makes it very much worth mention that the P4-X shows very little rainbow effect. With data images, the only time I saw the artifacts was with one screen that tends to bring them out. Even with that screen they were so fleeting that I didn't find them bothersome. I saw them a bit more often in video, but primarily in a single scene that tends to show them easily. Given that I see these artifacts relatively easily, few people, if any, should see them often enough to consider them a problem.

One minor issue that the P4-X shares with most small projectors is a nearly useless sound system. The 1-watt stereo speakers are barely loud enough to let you hear everything if you're sitting right next to the projector in a quiet room. If you need sound, plan on using the audio output port, preferably with a powered headset or speakers.

Compounding the problem of low speaker volume is that the fan is loud enough to be a potential issue. I tend to ignore fan noise, but if you're sitting close enough to the projector to hear sound from the speakers, the whine of the P4-X fan, rated at 30 dB, is hard to ignore. For those who are sensitive to fan noise, this could be a problem.

By any reasonable measure, the AAXA P4-X Pico Projector is impressive for the price. It can read files from memory or a wide variety of image sources; it offers a brighter image and better image quality for both data and video than most projectors its size; and it doesn't show as many rainbow artifacts as most. The fan noise and low volume are the only real shortcomings, and the low volume, at least, is pretty much standard for the breed. All this makes the AAXA P4-X Pico Projector an easy pick as Editors' Choice for low-cost pico or palmtop projector.

More Projector Reviews:
•   Sony Xperia Touch
•   AAXA P300 Neo Pico Projector
•   AAXA HD Pico Projector
•   NEC Display Solutions NP-ME401W
•   Casio XJ-UT311WN
•  more

Final Thoughts

AAXA P4-X Pico Projector - AAXA P4-X Pico Projector

The Latest Technology Product Reviews, News, Tips, and Deals

4.0 Excellent

The AAXA P4-X Pico Projector is bright for its size, at a claimed 80 lumens using AC power or 50 lumens with batteries, and delivers surprisingly good image quality.

About Our Expert

M. David Stone

M. David Stone

Contributing Editor

My Experience

Most of my current work for PCMag is about printers and projectors, but I've covered a wide variety of other subjects—in more than 4,000 pieces, over more than 40 years—including both computer-related areas and others ranging from ape language experiments, to politics, to cosmology, to space colonies. I've written for PCMag.com from its start, and for PC Magazine before that, as a Contributor, then a Contributing Editor, then as the Lead Analyst for Printers, Scanners, and Projectors, and now, after a short hiatus, back to Contributing Editor.

I'm pretty sure I'm the only person who worked on every "Project Printer" blockbuster PCMag ever produced, often writing 15 or more reviews for the year's big printer blowout. (I snuck in a single review one year when I was writing a book, strictly so I could keep that claim alive.)

I've always worked for PCMag as a freelancer, which has freed me to take time away to write nine books, be a major contributor to four others, and write for other publications, including Wired, Computer Shopper, Projector Central, and Science Digest, where I was Computers Editor. I also wrote a computer column at one point for The Newark Star-Ledger.

Although I started my career primarily as a science (mostly physics and astronomy) and science-fiction writer (published in Analog), my non-computer-related work runs the gamut from the Project Data Book for NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (written for GE's Astro-Space Division) to the script for a video overview of a top company in the gaming industry (that would be gambling, not video games). My books include The Underground Guide to Color Printers (Addison-Wesley), Troubleshooting Your PC (Microsoft Press), and Faster, Smarter Digital Photography (Microsoft Press).

Having covered a wide range of subjects, I've developed a serial expertise in many of them. The ones most relevant to my current work at PCMag.com are all imaging technologies.

The Technology I Use

I buy new PCs for my writing desk infrequently, because it takes a week or more to customize the settings the way I want them. At the moment, I have an HP Envy tower running Windows 10, but it's old enough to have a Windows 7 sticker on it. Its latest lease on a longer life is courtesy of a newly installed 500GB Samsung SSD 870 EVO.

Elsewhere in my house is an assortment of older and newer PCs. The older ones are dedicated to specific tasks, like the one I've been using to slowly digitize all the paper stored in my filing cabinets, while the newer ones are testbeds for printer and projector reviews.

For writing, I use Microsoft Word 2003, because I find it too annoying to take my hands off the keyboard to give mouse commands using the Ribbon. My workhorse printers are a Xerox Phaser 6280 color laser and a Dymo LabelWriter 450 Twin Turbo for labels and stamps. I also have a Canon Pixma iP8720 for printing photos, and a Canon ImageFormula DR-C225 for scanning.

My first computer was bought to replace my IBM Selectric for writing. After rejecting both the IBM PC (which had just been introduced) and the Apple II because of the keyboards, I chose a Vector Graphics Vector 3 CP/M machine with dual floppies. The first MS-DOS machine I was willing to use for writing was the IBM AT, with its much-improved keyboard compared with the original PC and its gargantuan 20MB hard drive.

Read full bio